Charles Ormiston

436 citations
11 papers · 304 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Ormiston

11 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Charles Ormiston
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Speech and Hearing 215
  • Business and International Management 7
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 97
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 36
  • Surgery 89
Replace Lucía Medina with:
Lucía Medina Spain
Susan McGowan United Kingdom
Puja Aggarwal United States
Kalika P. Sarma United States
Cui Yang Germany
Jhankruti Zaveri United States
Erwin M. Hearne United States
Peter Koerver Schmidt Denmark
Cecilia Rincón‐Castanedo Spain
Veit Zebralla Germany
Charles Ormiston relative to Lucía Medina Spain Lucía Medina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lucía Medina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Ormiston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Ormiston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Ormiston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Ormiston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Ormiston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Ormiston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Ormiston. The network helps show where Charles Ormiston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Charles Ormiston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Ormiston Line = papers co-authored together Charles Ormiston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199761
2 200960
3
Silent aspiration: results of 2,000 video fluoroscopic evaluations.
200954
4 200233
5 200322
6 199521
7 199621
8
How to Win in Emerging Markets
200812
9 200212
10 20026
11 20022

About Charles Ormiston

Charles Ormiston is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Physiology and Strategy and Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (6 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (3 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (2 papers), Business Strategies and Innovation (1 paper), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (1 paper), Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper) and Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (215 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (97 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (36 citations) and Surgery (89 citations). Charles Ormiston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Tess Sierzant, Molly Engle, Orit Gadiesh and David M. Eckmann. Their work appears in journals such as Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, Dysphagia, Strategy and Leadership and Journal of Business Strategy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact