Charles Muscatine
- Classics top 1%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- History top 5%
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Paul G. RuggiersE. Talbot DonaldsonRichard KuhnsThomas N. ChaseRobert L. BelknapHazard AdamsWilliam D. Paden
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (10 papers)Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers)Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Higher EducationJournal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismThe Modern Language Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Charles Muscatine
11 papers receiving 53 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Classics 116
- Literature and Literary Theory 49
- History 49
- Language and Linguistics 37
- Sociology and Political Science 14
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Muscatine
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Muscatine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Muscatine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Muscatine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Muscatine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Muscatine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Muscatine. The network helps show where Charles Muscatine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Muscatine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Muscatine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Muscatine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Muscatine. Charles Muscatine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fixing College Education: A New Curriculum for the Twenty-first Century | 6 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Prospective Teachers and the Liberal Arts Curriculum. | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | The Borzoi college reader | 4 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 79 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 5 |
About Charles Muscatine
Charles Muscatine is a scholar working on Classics, History and Language and Linguistics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (116 citations), History (49 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (49 citations). Charles Muscatine has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul G. Ruggiers, E. Talbot Donaldson, Richard Kuhns, Thomas N. Chase, Robert L. Belknap, Hazard Adams and William D. Paden. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Higher Education, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.