Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Smart literature review: a practical topic modelling approach to exploratory literature review
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Møller
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Møller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Møller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Møller more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Møller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Møller. The network helps show where Charles Møller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Møller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Møller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Møller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Møller. Charles Møller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Møller, Charles, et al.. (2018). Process model automation for industry 4.0: Challenges for automated model generation based on laboratory experiments. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 2218. 201–216.2 indexed citations
Rahimi, Fatemeh, Charles Møller, & Lars Hvam. (2014). Alignment Between Business Process Governance and IT Governance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
12.
Rahimi, Fatemeh, Charles Møller, & Lars Hvam. (2014). 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2014. Americas Conference on Information Systems.189 indexed citations
13.
Møller, Charles. (2007). THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR BUSINESS PROCESS INNOVATION - Towards a Research Program on Global Supply Chain Intelligence. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 233–238.1 indexed citations
Møller, Charles. (2006). Developing the Process Innovation Laboratory: a new approach to business process innovation. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 309.1 indexed citations
16.
Møller, Charles, et al.. (2005). Issues in ERP Education Development - Evaluation of the Options Using Three Different Models.8 indexed citations
17.
Kræmmergaard, Pernille, et al.. (2005). Measuring maturity in the IS function in ERP organizations. 89–100.1 indexed citations
18.
Møller, Charles. (2004). Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Americas Conference on Information Systems.74 indexed citations
19.
Møller, Charles. (2004). ERP in large Danish enterprises: Implications for SCM. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 3934–3941.2 indexed citations
20.
Møller, Charles. (1996). Proceedings of the 6th IFIP TC5/WG5.7 International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems - APMS'96.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.