Charles Curtis
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
Papers in
- Genetics 13
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 10
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 4
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 4
- Co-authors
- Jonathan Mill (1 shared paper)Neil R. Smith (1 shared paper)Bernard Freeman (1 shared paper)Ian Craig (1 shared paper)Gerome Breen (15 shared papers)Hamel Patel (17 shared papers)Stephen Newhouse (10 shared papers)Robert Plomin (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Translational Psychiatry (6 papers)Schizophrenia Research (2 papers)Behavior Genetics (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Molecular Psychiatry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Charles Curtis
31 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Biological Psychiatry 46
- Behavioral Neuroscience 45
- Genetics 289
- Psychiatry and Mental health 135
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Curtis
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Curtis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Curtis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Curtis. The network helps show where Charles Curtis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 264 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 12 |
About Charles Curtis
Charles Curtis is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (10 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (46 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations), Genetics (289 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (135 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 citations). Charles Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Mill, Neil R. Smith, Bernard Freeman, Ian Craig, Gerome Breen, Hamel Patel, Stephen Newhouse, Robert Plomin, Sang Hyuck Lee and Eva Krapohl. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Behavior Genetics, PLoS ONE and Molecular Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.