Charles Besançon

1.7k total citations
8 papers, 676 citations indexed

About

Charles Besançon is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Besançon has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 676 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 4 papers in Ecology and 3 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Charles Besançon's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). Charles Besançon is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). Charles Besançon collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Charles Besançon's co-authors include Neil D. Burgess, Corinna Ravilious, Colleen Corrigan, Moreno Di Marco, Sarah Chapman, Stephen Kearney, Hugh P. Possingham, Joseph Maina, James Watson and Glenn Althor and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Conservation, Environmental Research Letters and Global Ecology and Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Charles Besançon

7 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Charles Besançon United States 6 315 290 182 177 95 8 676
Andrew Clements United Kingdom 2 368 1.2× 286 1.0× 216 1.2× 139 0.8× 148 1.6× 2 818
Daniel W. Salzer United States 7 304 1.0× 411 1.4× 244 1.3× 247 1.4× 105 1.1× 9 761
Cyril Bernard France 8 233 0.7× 285 1.0× 160 0.9× 171 1.0× 51 0.5× 13 654
Philip Bubb United Kingdom 8 263 0.8× 222 0.8× 134 0.7× 173 1.0× 89 0.9× 14 524
Natasha C. R. Cadenhead Australia 7 250 0.8× 282 1.0× 222 1.2× 159 0.9× 65 0.7× 7 557
Gabriela Cruz-Piñón Mexico 7 351 1.1× 371 1.3× 219 1.2× 138 0.8× 85 0.9× 13 638
C. Ashton Drew United States 11 233 0.7× 345 1.2× 263 1.4× 229 1.3× 75 0.8× 18 696
Farshid S. Ahrestani United States 11 221 0.7× 342 1.2× 191 1.0× 123 0.7× 100 1.1× 18 615
Abigail S. Golden United States 9 218 0.7× 251 0.9× 155 0.9× 104 0.6× 79 0.8× 15 626
Aerin L. Jacob Canada 18 344 1.1× 326 1.1× 226 1.2× 124 0.7× 137 1.4× 39 786

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Besançon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Besançon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Besançon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Besançon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Besançon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Besançon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Besançon. The network helps show where Charles Besançon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Besançon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Besançon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Besançon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Besançon. Charles Besançon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Parks, Sean A., Lisa M. Holsinger, Caitlin E. Littlefield, et al.. (2022). Efficacy of the global protected area network is threatened by disappearing climates and potential transboundary range shifts. Environmental Research Letters. 17(5). 54016–54016. 16 indexed citations
2.
Marco, Moreno Di, Sarah Chapman, Glenn Althor, et al.. (2017). Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science. Global Ecology and Conservation. 10. 32–42. 233 indexed citations
3.
Ravilious, Corinna, et al.. (2012). Protected Planet Report 2014: Tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. 187 indexed citations
4.
Sandwith, Trevor & Charles Besançon. (2010). Making Peace: Protected Areas Contributing to Conflict Resolution. 243–256.
5.
Coad, Lauren, Neil D. Burgess, Colby Loucks, et al.. (2009). Reply to Jenkins and Joppa – Expansion of the global terrestrial protected area system. Biological Conservation. 143(1). 5–6. 1 indexed citations
6.
Schmitt, Christine B., Neil D. Burgess, Lauren Coad, et al.. (2009). Global analysis of the protection status of the world’s forests. Biological Conservation. 142(10). 2122–2130. 193 indexed citations
7.
Coad, Lauren, Neil D. Burgess, Colby Loucks, et al.. (2009). The ecological representativeness of the global protected areas estate in 2009: progress towards the CBD 2010 target. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 16 indexed citations
8.
Belokurov, Alexander, Charles Besançon, & Christine B. Schmitt. (2008). Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis. Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution). 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026