Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets
2005818 citationsStuart Chape, James Harrison et al.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciencesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Igor Lysenko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Igor Lysenko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Igor Lysenko more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Igor Lysenko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Igor Lysenko. The network helps show where Igor Lysenko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Igor Lysenko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Igor Lysenko.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Igor Lysenko based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Igor Lysenko. Igor Lysenko is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lysenko, Igor, et al.. (2018). Information Technologies Efficiency Models for Agile Systems Functioning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Campbell, Alison, Valerie Kapos, & Igor Lysenko. (2008). Carbon emissions from forest loss in protected areas. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).13 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, Alison, Igor Lysenko, & Lera Miles. (2008). Carbon Storage in Protected Areas – Technical Report. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).53 indexed citations
15.
Chape, Stuart, James Harrison, Mark Spalding, & Igor Lysenko. (2005). Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 360(1454). 443–455.818 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Bystriakova, Nadia, Valerie Kapos, & Igor Lysenko. (2004). Bamboo Biodiversity: Africa, Madagascar and the Americas. UNEP-WCMC Biodiversity Series 19. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).12 indexed citations
17.
Kapos, Valerie, Igor Lysenko, & Robert Lesslie. (2002). ASSESSING FOREST INTEGRITY AND NATURALNESS IN RELATION TO BIODIVERSITY.18 indexed citations
18.
Lysenko, Igor & Christoph Zöckler. (2001). The 25 largest un-fragmented wilderness Areas in the Arctic. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
19.
Lysenko, Igor & Christoph Zöckler. (2000). Water Birds on the Edge: first circumpolar assessment of climate chage impact of Arctic breeding water birds. WCMC Biodiversity Series 11. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).6 indexed citations
20.
Lysenko, Igor, et al.. (1996). Proposed Protected Areas in the Circumpolar Arctic.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.