Charles B. Schmitt
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- History top 0.5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Archeology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jill KrayeE. J. AshworthEckhard KeßlerQuentin SkinnerNeal W. GilbertPaul F. GrendlerWilliam F. RyanDilwyn Knox
- Topics
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (11 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers)Historical Philosophy and Science (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Charles B. Schmitt
42 papers receiving 446 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- History and Philosophy of Science 241
- Philosophy 211
- History 200
- Anthropology 126
- Archeology 81
Countries citing papers authored by Charles B. Schmitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles B. Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles B. Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles B. Schmitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles B. Schmitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles B. Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles B. Schmitt. The network helps show where Charles B. Schmitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles B. Schmitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles B. Schmitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles B. Schmitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles B. Schmitt. Charles B. Schmitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Aristote et la Renaissance | 1 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Scepticism From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment | 3 |
| 5 | Über die Vorstellung. De imaginatione | 1 |
| 6 | Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages the Theology and Other Texts | 19 |
| 7 | Problemi dell'aristotelismo rinascimentale | 1 |
| 8 | The Aristotelian tradition and Renaissance universities | 21 |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | A Critical Survey and Bibliography of Studies on Renaissance Aristotelianism | 1 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 83 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Charles B. Schmitt
Charles B. Schmitt is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Philosophy, having authored 55 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (11 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers) and Historical Philosophy and Science (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (241 citations), Classics (74 citations) and History (200 citations). Charles B. Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jill Kraye, E. J. Ashworth, Eckhard Keßler, Quentin Skinner, Neal W. Gilbert, Paul F. Grendler, William F. Ryan, Dilwyn Knox, F. Edward Cranz and Lynn S. Joy. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The American Historical Review and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.