Chao-Ming Hsieh
About
In The Last Decade
Chao-Ming Hsieh
4 papers receiving 469 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Molecular Biology 302
- Oncology 124
- Organic Chemistry 120
- Biomedical Engineering 61
- Toxicology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Chao-Ming Hsieh
This map shows the geographic impact of Chao-Ming Hsieh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chao-Ming Hsieh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chao-Ming Hsieh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chao-Ming Hsieh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chao-Ming Hsieh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chao-Ming Hsieh. The network helps show where Chao-Ming Hsieh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chao-Ming Hsieh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chao-Ming Hsieh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chao-Ming Hsieh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chao-Ming Hsieh. Chao-Ming Hsieh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | Topoisomerases as anticancer targets breakdown → | 341 |
| 4 | 101 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.