Chandan Nath

1.2k citations
71 papers · 910 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Chandan Nath

66 papers receiving 870 citations

Peers

Chandan Nath
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Molecular Medicine 70
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 26
  • Virology 58
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 43
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 96
Replace Cínthia Melazzo de Andrade with:
Cínthia Melazzo de Andrade Brazil
Houri Sepehri Iran
Albert Cheung-Hoi Yu China
Manuel Freire‐Garabal Spain
Laura J. McIntosh United States
Ishan Patro India
Meenakshi Sharma India
Daniel Ortuño‐Sahagún Mexico
Lilly Mark United States
Walter K.K. Ho Hong Kong
Chandan Nath relative to Cínthia Melazzo de Andrade Brazil Cínthia Melazzo de Andrade's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Cínthia Melazzo de Andrade · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chandan Nath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chandan Nath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chandan Nath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chandan Nath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chandan Nath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chandan Nath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chandan Nath. The network helps show where Chandan Nath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chandan Nath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chandan Nath Line = papers co-authored together Chandan Nath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202172
2 200172
3 201370
4 202162
5 200062
6 201053
7 200548
8 200544
9 199138
10 201526
11 201324
12 201223
13 201420
14 198220
15 201619
16 202117
17 200015
18 202012
19 201912
20
Effect of calcium channel blockers on withdrawal syndrome of lorazepam in rats.
199612

About Chandan Nath

Chandan Nath is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Food Science, Organic Chemistry and Pharmacology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (8 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (7 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (7 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (70 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (26 citations), Virology (58 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (43 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (96 citations). Chandan Nath has collaborated with scholars based in India, Bangladesh and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Amitava Das, Madhu Dikshit, Supriya Swarnkar, Ishan Patro, Gautam Palit, Tridip Das, R. Mathur, Shakir Ali, Abul Kalam Najmi and Kamal K. Kapoor. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacological Research, European Journal of Pharmacology, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, PLoS ONE and Antibiotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact