C.H.A. Hogben

1.0k citations
21 papers · 822 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

C.H.A. Hogben

20 papers receiving 792 citations

Peers

C.H.A. Hogben
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 674
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 154
  • Radiation 76
  • Materials Chemistry 395
  • Aerospace Engineering 201
Replace Paulo Abreu with:
Paulo Abreu United Kingdom
P. Heesterman United Kingdom
Sorayya Moradi United Kingdom
P. Chmielewski Germany
I.D. Young United Kingdom
S.E. Dorling United Kingdom
M. Beldishevski United Kingdom
Emmi Tholerus United Kingdom
Adam V. Stephen United Kingdom
F.E. Eriksson United Kingdom
C.H.A. Hogben relative to Paulo Abreu United Kingdom Paulo Abreu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paulo Abreu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.H.A. Hogben

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.H.A. Hogben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.H.A. Hogben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.H.A. Hogben more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.H.A. Hogben

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.H.A. Hogben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.H.A. Hogben. The network helps show where C.H.A. Hogben may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.H.A. Hogben, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.H.A. Hogben Line = papers co-authored together C.H.A. Hogben links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017162
2 2022116
3 201994
4 202280
5 202467
6 202260
7 201052
8 201749
9 200337
10 200528
11 202419
12 201214
13 201211
14 202010
15 20248
16 20155
17 20194
18 20042
19 20242
20
THE JETFSM DATA ACQUISITION FRAMEWORK, AND PROPOSED USAGE FOR ITER
20081

About C.H.A. Hogben

C.H.A. Hogben is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 822 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (12 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (3 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Real-Time Systems Scheduling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (674 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (154 citations), Radiation (76 citations), Materials Chemistry (395 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (201 citations). C.H.A. Hogben has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include S. Griph, L. Cupido, J. Fessey, F. Clairet, L. Meneses, A. Sirinelli, Jet-Efda Contributors, M. J. Walsh, Robert Felton and B. Alper. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Review of Scientific Instruments, Nature Physics and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact