J. Farthing

442 total citations
10 papers, 30 citations indexed

About

J. Farthing is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Farthing has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 30 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. Farthing's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (4 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (2 papers) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (2 papers). J. Farthing is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (4 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (2 papers) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (2 papers). J. Farthing collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Italy. J. Farthing's co-authors include E. Joffrin, J. Sousa, C.M. Roach, R. Felton, O. Hemming, S. Arshad, J.G. Cordey, H. Fernandes, M. von Hellermann and D. Kinna and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Fusion Engineering and Design and Fusion Science & Technology.

In The Last Decade

J. Farthing

8 papers receiving 27 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Farthing United Kingdom 3 18 10 7 7 4 10 30
D. Real Spain 5 20 1.1× 9 0.9× 7 1.0× 5 0.7× 5 1.3× 25 41
P. Chochula Switzerland 4 20 1.1× 8 0.8× 6 0.9× 2 0.3× 3 0.8× 20 37
E. D. Fraenkel Netherlands 3 27 1.5× 5 0.5× 26 3.7× 9 1.3× 3 0.8× 4 38
M. Votava United States 4 16 0.9× 16 1.6× 2 0.3× 5 0.7× 1 0.3× 18 34
S. K. Chan United Kingdom 4 25 1.4× 18 1.8× 4 0.6× 3 0.4× 3 0.8× 7 56
A. L. Maslennikov Italy 3 19 1.1× 11 1.1× 4 0.6× 12 1.7× 5 36
J. J. Brooke United Kingdom 4 43 2.4× 10 1.0× 8 1.1× 2 0.3× 20 54
X. C. Meng China 3 15 0.8× 7 0.7× 3 0.4× 6 0.9× 14 3.5× 6 29
Suman Deb India 5 43 2.4× 3 0.3× 6 0.9× 9 1.3× 5 1.3× 17 61
S. Kobayashi Japan 3 11 0.6× 5 0.5× 4 0.6× 3 0.4× 6 21

Countries citing papers authored by J. Farthing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Farthing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Farthing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Farthing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Farthing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Farthing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Farthing. The network helps show where J. Farthing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Farthing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Farthing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Farthing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Farthing. J. Farthing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Tommasi, G. De, J. Farthing, E. Joffrin, et al.. (2015). A proposal for the demonstration of the ITER Remote Experimentation Centre with collaborating European Tokamaks. ENEA Open Archive (National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development). 1–6. 1 indexed citations
2.
Evans, Charles R., C Boatella, P. Woskov, et al.. (2013). Toroidal Alfven Eigenmode Amplifier Control at JET Using Commercial FPGA and PXI Platform to Study Plasma Instabilities. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 2 indexed citations
3.
Lennholm, M., F. Bouquey, H. Braune, et al.. (2011). FEASIBILITY OF AN ECRH SYSTEM FOR JET: PLANT LAYOUT, AUXILIARIES AND SERVICES. 99–104.
4.
Murari, A., J. Vega, G. Vagliasindi, et al.. (2009). Recent developments in data mining and soft computing for JET with a view on ITER. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(7-11). 1372–1375. 1 indexed citations
5.
Arshad, S., J.G. Cordey, D. C. McDonald, et al.. (2008). Chapter 11: Data Validation, Analysis, and Applications for Fusion Plasmas. Fusion Science & Technology. 53(2). 667–698. 8 indexed citations
6.
Murari, A., J. Vega, A. Alonso, et al.. (2008). How to Extract Information and Knowledge from Fusion Massive Databases. AIP conference proceedings. 988. 457–470.
7.
Batista, A.J.N., D. Alves, N. Cruz, et al.. (2006). An FPGA-based multi-rate interpolator with real-time rate change for a JET test-bench system. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 53(3). 756–760. 2 indexed citations
8.
Batista, A.J.N., D. Alves, N. Cruz, et al.. (2005). A FPGA-based multi-rate interpolator with real-time rate change for a JET test-bench system. 5 pp.–5 pp.. 1 indexed citations
9.
Batista, A.J.N., H. Fernandes, J. Sousa, et al.. (2004). A test-bench for the real-time project phase 2 of JET. Fusion Engineering and Design. 71(1-4). 83–88. 7 indexed citations
10.
Suttrop, W., et al.. (2002). Remote participation at JET Task Force work: users’ experience. Fusion Engineering and Design. 60(3). 459–465. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026