Céu Mateus

3.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
101 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Céu Mateus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Céu Mateus has authored 101 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in General Health Professions, 27 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 15 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Céu Mateus's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (22 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (7 papers). Céu Mateus is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (22 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (11 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (7 papers). Céu Mateus collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and France. Céu Mateus's co-authors include N Eze, Tiago Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi, Caroline Robert, Émilie Routier, Andrew Street, Siok Swan Tan, Wilm Quentin, Ain Aaviksoo, Unto Häkkinen and Reinhard Busse and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Céu Mateus

95 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?

2013 371 citations Céu Mateus, Wilm Quentin et al. PubMed profile →
Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation

2020 202 citations Céu Mateus et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Céu Mateus United Kingdom	22	543	465	375	293	239	101	2.0k
Jason Madan United Kingdom	26	371 0.7×	471 1.0×	582 1.6×	515 1.8×	244 1.0×	133	2.9k
Elizabeth A. Middleton United States	23	295 0.5×	594 1.3×	355 0.9×	556 1.9×	150 0.6×	49	2.7k
Peter K. K. Wong Australia	21	474 0.9×	296 0.6×	503 1.3×	260 0.9×	177 0.7×	64	3.3k
Jeremy Jones United Kingdom	30	323 0.6×	951 2.0×	298 0.8×	378 1.3×	416 1.7×	73	3.7k
Rachael Fleurence United States	24	271 0.5×	473 1.0×	692 1.8×	402 1.4×	356 1.5×	50	3.2k
Ambuj Kumar United States	37	1.0k 1.8×	329 0.7×	321 0.9×	685 2.3×	550 2.3×	318	4.9k
Fei Tian China	13	611 1.1×	168 0.4×	313 0.8×	307 1.0×	199 0.8×	38	3.6k
Beth Devine United States	20	258 0.5×	300 0.6×	325 0.9×	516 1.8×	579 2.4×	110	2.8k
Jacqui Wise	21	251 0.5×	444 1.0×	225 0.6×	253 0.9×	262 1.1×	580	2.9k
M. Elske van den Akker‐van Marle Netherlands	29	448 0.8×	340 0.7×	291 0.8×	683 2.3×	332 1.4×	155	2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Céu Mateus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Céu Mateus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céu Mateus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céu Mateus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Céu Mateus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céu Mateus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céu Mateus. The network helps show where Céu Mateus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céu Mateus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céu Mateus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céu Mateus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Céu Mateus. Céu Mateus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Perelman, Julian, et al.. (2026). Revised methods guide for economic evaluation studies of health technologies in Portugal. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 42(1). e11–e11.

Liverpool, Shaun, et al.. (2025). Updates on digital mental health interventions for children and young people: systematic overview of reviews. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 34(10). 2961–2974. 2 indexed citations

Fish, Rebecca, et al.. (2025). Long acting injectable buprenorphine: Perspectives from service-users, staff and stakeholders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports. 15. 100328–100328.

Walshe, Catherine, Céu Mateus, Sandra Varey, et al.. (2023). ‘Thank goodness you’re here’. Exploring the impact on patients, family carers and staff of enhanced 7-day specialist palliative care services: A mixed methods study. Palliative Medicine. 37(10). 1484–1497. 1 indexed citations

Costa, Suzete, Maria Cary, António Teixeira Rodrigues, et al.. (2023). Real-World Effectiveness in Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia Collaborative Management between Pharmacies and Primary Care in Portugal: A Multicenter Pragmatic Controlled Trial (USFarmácia®). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(15). 6496–6496. 3 indexed citations

Watkins, Caroline, Svetlana Tishkovskaya, Chris Sutton, et al.. (2022). Systematic voiding programme in adults with urinary incontinence following acute stroke: the ICONS-II RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 26(31). 1–88. 4 indexed citations

Pereira, Luís Nobre, et al.. (2022). C-sections and hospital characteristics: a long term analysis on low-risk deliveries. PubMed. 1(1). 15–15. 3 indexed citations

Korfage, Ida J., Suzanne Polinder, Nancy Preston, et al.. (2022). Healthcare use and healthcare costs for patients with advanced cancer; the international ACTION cluster-randomised trial on advance care planning. Palliative Medicine. 37(5). 707–718. 5 indexed citations

Waldron, Cherry-Ann, Emma Thomas‐Jones, Jolanta Bernatoniene, et al.. (2022). Biomarker-guided duration of Antibiotic Treatment in Children Hospitalised with confirmed or suspected bacterial infection (BATCH): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 12(1). e047490–e047490. 3 indexed citations

10.

Knighting, Katherine, Gerlinde Pilkington, Jane Noyes, et al.. (2021). Respite care and short breaks for young adults aged 18–40 with complex health-care needs: mixed-methods systematic review and conceptual framework development. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(6). 1–268. 3 indexed citations

11.

Simpson, Jane, et al.. (2021). Exploring the Experiences of Members of the International Food Safety Authorities Network: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Food Protection. 84(10). 1683–1697. 3 indexed citations

12.

Chapman, Christopher S., Gerardine Doyle, Allan Hansen, et al.. (2021). Managing quality of cost information in clinical costing: evidence across seven countries. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management. 34(2). 310–329. 8 indexed citations

13.

Andrews, Robert, Charlotte Jones, Helen Jones, et al.. (2021). Mo bile Heal t h B i ometrics to Enhance Exercise and Physical Acti v ity A dherence in T yp e 2 Diabetes (MOTIVATE-T2D): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 11(11). e052563–e052563. 5 indexed citations

14.

Mateus, Céu, et al.. (2020). Exploring the International Food Safety Authorities Network as a Community of Practice: Results from a Global Survey of Network Members. Journal of Food Protection. 84(2). 262–274. 2 indexed citations

15.

Mateus, Céu, et al.. (2020). Looking Inside the International Food Safety Authorities Network Community Website. Journal of Food Protection. 83(11). 1889–1899. 4 indexed citations

16.

Robinson, Heather, D. E. Appelbe, Susanna Dodd, et al.. (2020). Methodological Challenges in Web-Based Trials: Update and Insights From the Relatives Education and Coping Toolkit Trial. JMIR Mental Health. 7(7). e15878–e15878. 9 indexed citations

17.

Lopes, H. de Souza, et al.. (2019). Identifying the long-term care beneficiaries: differences between risk factors of nursing homes and community-based services admissions. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 32(10). 2099–2110. 3 indexed citations

18.

Pilkington, Gerlinde, Katherine Knighting, Lucy Bray, et al.. (2019). The specification, acceptability and effectiveness of respite care and short breaks for young adults with complex healthcare needs: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Open. 9(6). e030470–e030470. 4 indexed citations

19.

Lopes, H. de Souza, et al.. (2018). Impact of long term care and mortality risk in community care and nursing homes populations. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 76. 160–168. 7 indexed citations

20.

Pereira, João & Céu Mateus. (2003). Custos indirectos associados à obesidade em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública. 65–80. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact