Lisbeth Serdén

724 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 522 citations indexed

About

Lisbeth Serdén is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Lisbeth Serdén has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 522 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Lisbeth Serdén's work include Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Hernia repair and management (2 papers). Lisbeth Serdén is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers) and Hernia repair and management (2 papers). Lisbeth Serdén collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and France. Lisbeth Serdén's co-authors include Alexander Geißler, Siok Swan Tan, Jacqueline O’Reilly, Francesc Cots, Reinhard Busse, Unto Häkkinen, Wilm Quentin, Zeynep Or, Ain Aaviksoo and Andrew Street and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Economics, Health Policy and European Journal of Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Lisbeth Serdén

8 papers receiving 506 citations

Hit Papers

Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transp... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lisbeth Serdén Sweden 6 279 241 81 79 65 8 522
Ain Aaviksoo Estonia 6 242 0.9× 270 1.1× 76 0.9× 79 1.0× 63 1.0× 12 580
David Scheller‐Kreinsen Germany 12 193 0.7× 154 0.6× 61 0.8× 51 0.6× 26 0.4× 18 374
Patricia H. Parkerton United States 14 165 0.6× 275 1.1× 35 0.4× 51 0.6× 81 1.2× 20 543
Lorens A. Helmchen United States 14 204 0.7× 247 1.0× 23 0.3× 37 0.5× 56 0.9× 31 619
Niccie L. McKay United States 14 330 1.2× 276 1.1× 65 0.8× 31 0.4× 26 0.4× 22 587
Miriam Wiley Ireland 14 216 0.8× 274 1.1× 29 0.4× 89 1.1× 42 0.6× 35 550
Andrea Donatini Italy 10 186 0.7× 244 1.0× 28 0.3× 131 1.7× 31 0.5× 18 556
Kristin L. Reiter United States 18 482 1.7× 543 2.3× 39 0.5× 57 0.7× 76 1.2× 69 862
Thanya Pathirana Australia 10 177 0.6× 233 1.0× 42 0.5× 221 2.8× 23 0.4× 21 720
Mauro Laudicella United Kingdom 14 426 1.5× 401 1.7× 57 0.7× 70 0.9× 10 0.2× 31 765

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Serdén

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Serdén's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Serdén with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Serdén more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Serdén

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Serdén. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Serdén. The network helps show where Lisbeth Serdén may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisbeth Serdén

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisbeth Serdén. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisbeth Serdén based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisbeth Serdén. Lisbeth Serdén is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Quentin, Wilm, Alexander Geißler, Friedrich Wittenbecher, et al.. (2018). Paying hospital specialists: Experiences and lessons from eight high-income countries. Health Policy. 122(5). 473–484. 24 indexed citations
2.
Tan, Siok Swan, Alexander Geißler, Lisbeth Serdén, et al.. (2014). DRG systems in Europe: variations in cost accounting systems among 12 countries. European Journal of Public Health. 24(6). 1023–1028. 45 indexed citations
3.
Häkkinen, Unto, Gunnar Rosenqvist, Mikko Peltola, et al.. (2014). Quality, cost, and their trade-off in treating AMI and stroke patients in European hospitals. Health Policy. 117(1). 15–27. 19 indexed citations
4.
Serdén, Lisbeth & Jacqueline O’Reilly. (2013). Patient classification and hospital reimbursement for inguinal hernia repair: a comparison across 11 European countries. Hernia. 18(2). 273–281. 5 indexed citations
5.
Busse, Reinhard, Alexander Geißler, Ain Aaviksoo, et al.. (2013). Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?. PubMed. 346. f3197–f3197. 371 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
O’Reilly, Jacqueline, et al.. (2012). PERFORMANCE OF 10 EUROPEAN DRG SYSTEMS IN EXPLAINING VARIATION IN RESOURCE UTILISATION IN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR. Health Economics. 21(S2). 89–101. 13 indexed citations
7.
Serdén, Lisbeth, Rikard Lindqvist, & Måns Rosén. (2005). [Benefits with well-educated medical secretaries. Improved coding in the patient registry following a course in classification and care documentation].. PubMed. 102(20). 1530, 1533–4, 1536. 2 indexed citations
8.
Serdén, Lisbeth, Rikard Lindqvist, & Måns Rosén. (2003). Have DRG-based prospective payment systems influenced the number of secondary diagnoses in health care administrative data?. Health Policy. 65(2). 101–107. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026