Lisbeth Serdén
-
- Healthcare Quality and Management 2
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Healthcare Policy and Management 5
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 3
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 2
- Finance top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
-
- Hernia repair and management 2
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 2
- Hip and Femur Fractures 2
-
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 1
- Co-authors
- Alexander GeißlerSiok Swan TanJacqueline O’ReillyZeynep OrWilm QuentinFrancesc CotsUnto HäkkinenReinhard Busse
- Partner nations
- SwedenNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Lisbeth Serdén
8 papers receiving 506 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Health Information Management 65
- Economics and Econometrics 279
- General Health Professions 241
- Finance 81
- Emergency Medicine 50
Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Serdén
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Serdén's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Serdén with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Serdén more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Serdén
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Serdén. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Serdén. The network helps show where Lisbeth Serdén may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Serdén, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 5 | Diagnosis related groups in Europe: moving towards transparency, efficiency, and quality in hospitals?breakdown → | 2013 | 371 |
| 6 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 7 | [Benefits with well-educated medical secretaries. Improved coding in the patient registry following a course in classification and care documentation]. | 2005 | 2 |
| 8 | 2003 | 43 |
About Lisbeth Serdén
Lisbeth Serdén is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Hernia repair and management (2 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (2 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (2 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (65 citations), Economics and Econometrics (279 citations) and General Health Professions (241 citations). Lisbeth Serdén has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Geißler, Siok Swan Tan, Jacqueline O’Reilly, Zeynep Or, Wilm Quentin, Francesc Cots, Unto Häkkinen, Reinhard Busse, Andrew Street and Conrad Kobel. Their work appears in journals such as Health Policy, Hernia, Health Economics, European Journal of Public Health and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.