Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan De Munck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan De Munck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan De Munck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan De Munck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan De Munck. The network helps show where Jan De Munck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan De Munck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan De Munck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan De Munck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan De Munck. Jan De Munck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Munck, Jan De, Philippe E. Van den Steen, Atsushi Mine, et al.. (2011). Inhibition of Enzymatic Degradation of Adhesive-Dentin Interfaces. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 23(5). 350–352.2 indexed citations
Jaecques, Siegfried, et al.. (2008). Sensitivity of micro-CT for microleakage detection around dental composite restorations. Journal of Dental Research. 87.1 indexed citations
Landuyt, Kirsten Van, J. Snauwaert, Jan De Munck, et al.. (2007). Origin of droplets with one-step self-etch adhesives. Journal of Dental Research. 86.1 indexed citations
Landuyt, Kirsten Van, et al.. (2005). Bonding effectiveness and morphological characterization of one-step self-etch adhesives. Journal of Dental Research. 84.1 indexed citations
14.
Landuyt, Kirsten Van, Jan De Munck, J. Snauwaert, et al.. (2004). Monomer-solvent phase-separation in contemporary one-step self-etch adhesives. Journal of Dental Research. 83.4 indexed citations
15.
Peumans, Marleen, Bart Van Meerbeek, Jan De Munck, & Paul Lambrechts. (2003). Two-year clinical effectiveness of a self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Journal of Dental Research. 82.4 indexed citations
16.
Munck, Jan De, Bart Van Meerbeek, Marleen Peumans, & Paul Lambrechts. (2003). Five-year Clinical Effectiveness of Two Three-step Total-etch Adhesives and Two Composites in Cervical Lesions. Journal of Dental Research. 82.2 indexed citations
17.
Munck, Jan De, et al.. (2003). Bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 82.1 indexed citations
18.
Meerbeek, Bart Van, et al.. (2003). Chemical bonding potential of adhesive materials to hydroxyapatite. Journal of Dental Research. 82.1 indexed citations
19.
Munck, Jan De, et al.. (2003). Micro-tensile bond strength of a contemporary total-etch and self-etch adhesive after in vivo degradation. Journal of Dental Research. 82.1 indexed citations
20.
Meerbeek, Bart Van, Jan De Munck, Hiroshi Yoshida, et al.. (2002). Micro-tensile bond strength of 4 total-etch adhesives to dentin after 4-year water storage. Journal of Dental Research. 81.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.