Céline Bœhm
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Christopher McCabeMatthew J. DolanManuel DreesA. DjouadiConstantinos SkordisDavid F. MotaPedro G. FerreiraThomas Lacroix
- Topics
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (30 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Céline Bœhm
33 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 59
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 45
- Artificial Intelligence 21
Countries citing papers authored by Céline Bœhm
This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Bœhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Bœhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Bœhm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Céline Bœhm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Bœhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Bœhm. The network helps show where Céline Bœhm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céline Bœhm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céline Bœhm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céline Bœhm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Céline Bœhm. Céline Bœhm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 123 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 70 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 177 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Céline Bœhm
Céline Bœhm is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (30 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.3k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (45 citations). Céline Bœhm has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher McCabe, Matthew J. Dolan, Manuel Drees, A. Djouadi, Constantinos Skordis, David F. Mota, Pedro G. Ferreira, Thomas Lacroix, Ryan Wilkinson and Sergio Palomares-Ruiz. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.