David F. Mota
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.2%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 131
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 73
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics 19
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 12
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.2%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 63
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 28
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 14
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 9
- Co-authors
- Tomi KoivistoDouglas J. ShawJohn D. BarrowBaojiu LiClaudio LlinaresCarsten van de BruckHans A. WintherWeiqiang Yang
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (8 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (5 papers)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- NorwayUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
David F. Mota
138 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 5.3k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 4.0k
- Instrumentation 147
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 430
- Oceanography 361
Countries citing papers authored by David F. Mota
This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Mota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Mota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Mota more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Mota
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Mota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Mota. The network helps show where David F. Mota may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David F. Mota, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 12 | Halo collapse: virialization by shear and rotation in dynamical dark-energy models | 2018 | 1 |
| 13 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 93 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 141 |
About David F. Mota
David F. Mota is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 143 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (131 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (73 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (63 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (28 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (19 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (14 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (12 papers) and Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (5.3k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (4.0k citations) and Instrumentation (147 citations). David F. Mota has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tomi Koivisto, Douglas J. Shaw, John D. Barrow, Baojiu Li, Claudio Llinares, Carsten van de Bruck, Hans A. Winther, Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan and Miguel Zumalacárregui. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.