Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
micrOMEGAs_3: A program for calculating dark matter observables
2013500 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
micrOMEGAs 2.0: A program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model
2006479 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with micrOMEGAs_2.2
2008466 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
micrOMEGAs: A program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM
2002431 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
micrOMEGAs5.0 : Freeze-in
2018327 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
micrOMEGAs4.1: Two dark matter candidates
2015287 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter
202460 citationsG. Bélanger, F. Boudjema et al.Computer Physics Communicationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Bélanger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Bélanger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Bélanger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Bélanger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Bélanger. The network helps show where G. Bélanger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Bélanger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Bélanger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Bélanger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Bélanger. G. Bélanger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bélanger, G., Kristjan Kannike, A. Pukhov, & M. Raidal. (2013). ℤ3scalar singlet dark matter. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2013(1). 22–22.69 indexed citations
14.
Vásquez, D. Albornoz, G. Bélanger, Rohini M. Godbole, & A. Pukhov. (2012). Higgs boson in the MSSM in light of the LHC. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(11).18 indexed citations
Djouadi, A., R. Kinnunen, E. Richter-Wa̧s, et al.. (1999). The Higgs Working Group: Summary Report. CERN Bulletin. 2258. 1–100.9 indexed citations
19.
Bélanger, G., G. Moultaka, A. Pukhov, et al.. (1998). Achievements beyond the standard model. Prepared for. 35–43.
20.
Boudjema, F., et al.. (1994). Electroweak Physics Issues at a High Energy Photon Collider. CERN Bulletin. 267–308.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.