This map shows the geographic impact of Ceil Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ceil Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ceil Lucas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ceil Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ceil Lucas. The network helps show where Ceil Lucas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ceil Lucas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ceil Lucas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ceil Lucas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ceil Lucas. Ceil Lucas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lucas, Ceil. (1998). Pinky Extension and Eye Gaze: Language Use in Deaf Communities. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).60 indexed citations
16.
Lucas, Ceil. (1997). Ebonics and ASL: Teaching Our Children the Codes of Power.. 15(5). 12.1 indexed citations
17.
Valli, Clayton, et al.. (1995). Linguistics of American Sign Language: An Introduction. Internet Archive (Internet Archive).245 indexed citations
18.
Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas. (1992). Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for Asl Users. Medical Entomology and Zoology.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.