Cedric M. Smith

56 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers

Cedric M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 185
  • Family Practice 17
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 163
  • Physiology 177
  • Neurology 99
Replace Stewart Wolf with:
Stewart Wolf United States
Ben Gouaux United States
Raphael J. Leo United States
Colin Brewer United Kingdom
Roy R. Reeves United States
Conor K. Farren Ireland
Vaishali Phatak United States
Paul Summergrad United States
Mary M. Gerkovich United States
George A. Kenna United States
Cedric M. Smith relative to Stewart Wolf United States Stewart Wolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Stewart Wolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cedric M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cedric M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cedric M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cedric M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cedric M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cedric M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cedric M. Smith. The network helps show where Cedric M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cedric M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cedric M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Cedric M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005207
2 1990101
3 196075
4
Textbook of Pharmacology
199158
5 199751
6 198347
7 196537
8 197035
9 198334
10 199929
11 197328
12 196328
13 197725
14 199925
15 195224
16 196021
17 196121
18 199018
19 198916
20 196412

About Cedric M. Smith

Cedric M. Smith is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Neurology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (16 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (185 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (163 citations), Physiology (177 citations) and Neurology (99 citations). Cedric M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Greece and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia A. Pristach, Alan M. Reynard, Akira Matsushita, Hebe B. Greizerstein, Drew H. Barzman, Edson X. Albuquerque, Grace M. Barnes, Robert B. Whitney, Claire M. Lathers and Earl Eldred. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Brain Research, Journal of Addictive Diseases and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact