Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges
2019296 citationsAnna Ibraeva, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia et al.Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practiceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Cecília Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecília Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecília Silva more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecília Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecília Silva. The network helps show where Cecília Silva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecília Silva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecília Silva.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecília Silva based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cecília Silva. Cecília Silva is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ibraeva, Anna, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, Cecília Silva, & António Pais Antunes. (2019). Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice. 132. 110–130.296 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Faggella‐Luby, Michael, Robin Griffith, Cecília Silva, & Molly Weinburgh. (2016). Assessing ELLs’ Reading Comprehension and Science Understandings Using Retellings. The Electronic Journal of Science Education. 20(3). 150–166.2 indexed citations
10.
Silva, Cecília. (2014). Teaching and Researching Language and Culture by Joan Kelly Hall : Applied Linguistics in Action Series Edited by Christopher N. Candlin & David R. Hall Harlow. 125–128.
Stéfani, Eduardo De, Hugo Deneo‐Pellegrini, Álvaro L. Ronco, et al.. (2011). Dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: a factor analysis in uruguay.. PubMed. 12(3). 753–9.22 indexed citations
14.
Weinburgh, Molly & Cecília Silva. (2011). Math, Science, and Models.. Science and Children. 49(1). 58–62.3 indexed citations
15.
Pinho, Paulo, et al.. (2009). Atlas da Grande Área Metropolitana do Porto. Open Repository of the University of Porto (University of Porto). 49–61.1 indexed citations
16.
Silva, Cecília. (2006). Task-Supported Language Teaching with Real Beginners. 203–208.1 indexed citations
17.
Silva, Cecília, et al.. (1997). Multicultural Education. Theory to Practice.. Teacher education & practice. 13(1). 22–38.6 indexed citations
Silva, Cecília, et al.. (1979). Wikchamni Coiled Basketry. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 1(2).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.