Cecilia Gelfi
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 0.5%
- Spectroscopy top 0.5%
- Physiology top 2%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Pier Giorgio RighettiNancy C. StellwagenDaniele CapitanioBarbara VerzolaP. CerretelliMichele VassoAgnese ViganòManuela Moriggi
- Topics
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (95 papers)Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (36 papers)Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cecilia Gelfi
233 papers receiving 6.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Molecular Biology 3.1k
- Biomedical Engineering 2.8k
- Spectroscopy 1.1k
- Physiology 899
- Cell Biology 778
Countries citing papers authored by Cecilia Gelfi
This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilia Gelfi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilia Gelfi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilia Gelfi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilia Gelfi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilia Gelfi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilia Gelfi. The network helps show where Cecilia Gelfi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecilia Gelfi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecilia Gelfi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecilia Gelfi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecilia Gelfi. Cecilia Gelfi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 61 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | Amplification of 18 dystrophin gene exons in DMD/BMD patients: simultaneous resolution by capillary electrophoresis in sieving liquid polymers. | 25 |
About Cecilia Gelfi
Cecilia Gelfi is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering, having authored 237 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (95 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (36 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (1.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.8k citations) and Cell Biology (778 citations). Cecilia Gelfi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pier Giorgio Righetti, Nancy C. Stellwagen, Daniele Capitanio, Barbara Verzola, P. Cerretelli, Michele Vasso, Agnese Viganò, Manuela Moriggi, Maurizio Ferrari and Attilio Citterio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Blood and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.