C.E. Love

609 total citations
21 papers, 433 citations indexed

About

C.E. Love is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Statistics and Probability and Software. According to data from OpenAlex, C.E. Love has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 433 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, 10 papers in Statistics and Probability and 6 papers in Software. Recurrent topics in C.E. Love's work include Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (11 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (10 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (6 papers). C.E. Love is often cited by papers focused on Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (11 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (10 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (6 papers). C.E. Love collaborates with scholars based in Canada, South Africa and United States. C.E. Love's co-authors include R. Guo, Waltraud Kahle, George Blazenko, Li‐Lian Yuan, Matthew A. Turner, Kim Fung Lam and D. Moffat and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Journal of Operational Research and Journal of the Operational Research Society.

In The Last Decade

C.E. Love

21 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C.E. Love Canada	12	301	188	130	107	53	21	433
Chang Hoon Lie South Korea	5	242 0.8×	107 0.6×	120 0.9×	116 1.1×	60 1.1×	9	315
Kellie Schneider United States	10	250 0.8×	62 0.3×	132 1.0×	86 0.8×	67 1.3×	26	362
Delia Montoro‐Cazorla Spain	14	436 1.4×	267 1.4×	168 1.3×	128 1.2×	20 0.4×	30	488
William Murdock United States	6	304 1.0×	73 0.4×	189 1.5×	70 0.7×	88 1.7×	10	344
Karim Atashgar Iran	9	182 0.6×	66 0.4×	27 0.2×	153 1.4×	29 0.5×	28	363
Tzu‐Hsin Liu Taiwan	15	369 1.2×	128 0.7×	168 1.3×	67 0.6×	34 0.6×	42	523
S. C. Malik India	11	201 0.7×	74 0.4×	117 0.9×	63 0.6×	5 0.1×	73	306
Miaomiao Yu China	12	204 0.7×	86 0.5×	70 0.5×	85 0.8×	11 0.2×	48	364
Yixiao Zhao China	10	186 0.6×	17 0.1×	19 0.1×	134 1.3×	17 0.3×	20	354
Timothy S. Vaughan United States	9	64 0.2×	33 0.2×	21 0.2×	59 0.6×	10 0.2×	22	336

Countries citing papers authored by C.E. Love

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.E. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.E. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.E. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.E. Love

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.E. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.E. Love. The network helps show where C.E. Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.E. Love

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.E. Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.E. Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.E. Love. C.E. Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Love, C.E., et al.. (2023). Risk of bias assessment tool for systematic review and meta-analysis of the gut microbiome. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. e13–e13. 2 indexed citations

Love, C.E., et al.. (2021). Automation of QIIME2 Metagenomic Analysis Platform. Current Protocols. 1(9). e254–e254. 33 indexed citations

Love, C.E., et al.. (2006). Grey repairable system analysis. International Journal of Automation and Computing. 3(2). 131–144. 4 indexed citations

Love, C.E., et al.. (2003). A general repair, proportional-hazards, framework to model complex repairable systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 52(1). 26–32. 80 indexed citations

Love, C.E., et al.. (2000). A simple recursive Markov chain model to determine the optimal replacement policies under general repairs. Computers & Operations Research. 27(4). 321–333. 17 indexed citations

Love, C.E., et al.. (2000). A discrete semi-Markov decision model to determine the optimal repair/replacement policy under general repairs. European Journal of Operational Research. 125(2). 398–409. 62 indexed citations

Love, C.E., et al.. (1998). An SMDP approach to optimal repair/replacement decisions for systems experiencing imperfect repairs. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. 4(2). 131–149. 12 indexed citations

Love, C.E. & R. Guo. (1996). Utilizing Weibull Failure Rates in Repair Limit Analysis for Equipment Replacement/Preventive Maintenance Decisions. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 47(11). 1366–1376. 38 indexed citations

Guo, R. & C.E. Love. (1996). Linear-spline approximation for semi-parametric modeling of failure data with proportional hazards. IEEE Transactions on Reliability. 45(2). 261–266. 3 indexed citations

10.

Love, C.E. & Kim Fung Lam. (1994). Classifying and controlling errors in forecasting using multiple criteria goal programming. Computers & Operations Research. 21(9). 979–989. 3 indexed citations

11.

Love, C.E. & R. Guo. (1994). Simulation strategies to identify the failure parameters of repairable systems under the influence of general repair. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 10(1). 37–47. 9 indexed citations

12.

Guo, R. & C.E. Love. (1994). Simulating nonhomogeneous poisson processes with proportional intensities. Naval Research Logistics (NRL). 41(4). 507–522. 12 indexed citations

13.

Love, C.E. & Matthew A. Turner. (1993). Note on utilizing stochastic optimal control in aggregate production planning. European Journal of Operational Research. 65(2). 199–206. 8 indexed citations

14.

Love, C.E. & R. Guo. (1993). An application of a bathtub failure model to imperfectly repaired systems data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 9(2). 127–135. 9 indexed citations

15.

Guo, R. & C.E. Love. (1992). Statistical analysis of an age model for imperfectly repaired systems. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 8(2). 133–146. 32 indexed citations

16.

Love, C.E. & R. Guo. (1991). Using proportional hazard modelling in plant maintenance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 7(1). 7–17. 44 indexed citations

17.

Love, C.E. & R. Guo. (1991). Application of weibull proportional hazards modelling to bad‐as‐old failure data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 7(3). 149–157. 31 indexed citations

18.

Love, C.E.. (1985). Source/sink inventory control for vehicle rental systems. Computers & Operations Research. 12(4). 349–364. 3 indexed citations

19.

Love, C.E., et al.. (1982). Repair Limit Policies for Vehicle Replacement^†. INFOR Information Systems and Operational Research. 20(3). 226–236. 17 indexed citations

20.

Love, C.E.. (1980). Optimal Equipment Transfer Pricing in Service Systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 31(7). 657–666. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact