C.E. Channing

436 total citations
8 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

C.E. Channing is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, C.E. Channing has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 3 papers in Small Animals and 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in C.E. Channing's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (6 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers). C.E. Channing is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (6 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers). C.E. Channing collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Zimbabwe. C.E. Channing's co-authors include P.M. Hocking, Robert B. Jones, B. O. Hughes, Maureen Bain, Sandra B. Wilson, P. M. Hocking, A.W. Walker, David Waddington and Graeme W Robertson and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science and British Poultry Science.

In The Last Decade

C.E. Channing

8 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C.E. Channing United Kingdom	6	312	169	48	48	42	8	345
H.A. Elson United Kingdom	9	438 1.4×	265 1.6×	34 0.7×	36 0.8×	24 0.6×	19	513
Stefanie Petow Germany	11	287 0.9×	117 0.7×	50 1.0×	26 0.5×	40 1.0×	23	350
Kate Hartcher Australia	9	345 1.1×	235 1.4×	27 0.6×	40 0.8×	34 0.8×	16	424
Ernst K.F. Fröhlich Switzerland	11	415 1.3×	299 1.8×	71 1.5×	51 1.1×	26 0.6×	12	473
I.D. Parkman United Kingdom	6	262 0.8×	110 0.7×	19 0.4×	32 0.7×	14 0.3×	6	308
Maryse Guinebretière France	13	335 1.1×	160 0.9×	34 0.7×	19 0.4×	35 0.8×	25	399
Mona F. Giersberg Netherlands	14	323 1.0×	256 1.5×	19 0.4×	30 0.6×	36 0.9×	36	382
Dorothée Bizeray France	8	462 1.5×	329 1.9×	18 0.4×	32 0.7×	18 0.4×	9	516
M.N. Katanbaf United States	10	377 1.2×	85 0.5×	24 0.5×	24 0.5×	49 1.2×	16	412
Panagiotis Sakkas United Kingdom	14	251 0.8×	147 0.9×	41 0.9×	12 0.3×	21 0.5×	25	346

Countries citing papers authored by C.E. Channing

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.E. Channing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.E. Channing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.E. Channing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.E. Channing

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.E. Channing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.E. Channing. The network helps show where C.E. Channing may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.E. Channing

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.E. Channing. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.E. Channing based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.E. Channing. C.E. Channing is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Channing, C.E., et al.. (2005). Comparisons of damaging feather pecking and time budgets in male and female turkeys of a traditional breed and a genetically selected male line. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 96(3-4). 281–292. 23 indexed citations

2.

Hocking, P.M., et al.. (2004). Between breed genetic variation for welfare-related behavioural traits in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 89(1-2). 85–105. 42 indexed citations

3.

Hocking, P. M., et al.. (2003). Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. British Poultry Science. 44(3). 365–373. 12 indexed citations

4.

Hocking, P. M., et al.. (2003). Genetic variation for egg production, egg quality and bone strength in selected and traditional breeds of laying fowl. British Poultry Science. 44(3). 365–373. 110 indexed citations

5.

Hocking, P.M., C.E. Channing, David Waddington, & Robert B. Jones. (2001). Age-related changes in fear, sociality and pecking behaviours in two strains of laying hen. British Poultry Science. 42(4). 414–423. 81 indexed citations

6.

Channing, C.E., B. O. Hughes, & A.W. Walker. (2001). Spatial distribution and behaviour of laying hens housed in an alternative system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 72(4). 335–345. 70 indexed citations

7.

Channing, C.E.. (1998). Feather pecking in adult laying hens: Can it be associated with pecking at inanimate objects?. British Poultry Science. 39(sup001). 15–16. 5 indexed citations

8.

Hughes, B. O. & C.E. Channing. (1998). Effect of restricting access to litter trays on their use by caged laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 56(1). 37–45. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact