This map shows the geographic impact of Cathy Duncan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathy Duncan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathy Duncan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathy Duncan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathy Duncan. The network helps show where Cathy Duncan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathy Duncan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathy Duncan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathy Duncan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cathy Duncan. Cathy Duncan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Duncan, Cathy, et al.. (2019). The AN-ACC assessment model. The Resource Utilisation and Classification Study: Report 2. Research Online (University of Wollongong).1 indexed citations
Halcomb, Elizabeth, Cathy Duncan, Darcy Morris, et al.. (2019). Topic 4: Future directions in health care delivery. Research Online (University of Wollongong).1 indexed citations
5.
Eagar, Kathy, et al.. (2019). AN-ACC: A national classification and funding model for residential aged care: Synthesis and consolidated recommendations. The Resource Utilisation and Classification Study: Report 6. Research Online (University of Wollongong).3 indexed citations
6.
Eagar, Kathy, et al.. (2019). Modelling the impact of the AN-ACC in Australia.The Resource Utilisation and Classification Study: Report 4. Research Online (University of Wollongong).1 indexed citations
7.
Eagar, Kathy, et al.. (2019). The Australian National Aged Care Classification (AN-ACC). The Resource Utilisation and Classification Study: Report 1. Research Online (University of Wollongong).4 indexed citations
Cardona, Beatriz, et al.. (2017). Ageing well at home: measuring the impact of community care for older people.1 indexed citations
11.
Thompson, Cristina, Kate Williams, Malcolm R Masso, et al.. (2017). Research into services and needs for people experiencing complicated grief: Final report. Research Online (University of Wollongong).6 indexed citations
12.
Kobel, Conrad, et al.. (2017). Alternative aged care assessment, classification system and funding models: final report.6 indexed citations
13.
Masso, Malcolm R, et al.. (2017). Specialist dementia care units.1 indexed citations
14.
Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2016). Younger Onset Dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias®. 31(8). 693–705.54 indexed citations
Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2014). Younger onset dementia: an overview of service and research issues. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 92.1 indexed citations
17.
Masso, Malcolm R, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of the Better Health Care Connections: Models for Short Term, More Intensive Health Care for Aged Care Recipients Program: first progress report.1 indexed citations
18.
Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2014). Younger onset dementia: a literature review. Research Online (University of Wollongong).10 indexed citations
19.
Fildes, David L, et al.. (2013). Final report: literature review and needs and feasibility assessment of services for people with younger onset dementia. Research Online (University of Wollongong).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.