Janet Sansoni

669 total citations
41 papers, 490 citations indexed

About

Janet Sansoni is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Sansoni has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 490 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Janet Sansoni's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (5 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers). Janet Sansoni is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (5 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (5 papers). Janet Sansoni collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and United States. Janet Sansoni's co-authors include Cathy Duncan, Darcy Morris, Graeme Hawthorne, Cristina Thompson, Ercole Vellone, Kathryn Williams, Kathy Eagar, Rebecca Cook, Arul Earnest and Ilana N. Ackerman and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and Patient Education and Counseling.

In The Last Decade

Janet Sansoni

35 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janet Sansoni Australia	10	226	102	90	72	66	41	490
Lisa Granville United States	9	155 0.7×	158 1.5×	81 0.9×	43 0.6×	52 0.8×	19	520
Maman Joyce Dogba Canada	16	244 1.1×	101 1.0×	45 0.5×	50 0.7×	65 1.0×	46	661
Maggie Somerset United Kingdom	15	156 0.7×	84 0.8×	50 0.6×	64 0.9×	33 0.5×	25	550
Alba Realpe United Kingdom	15	203 0.9×	86 0.8×	72 0.8×	70 1.0×	231 3.5×	40	708
M Koopmanschap Netherlands	8	302 1.3×	37 0.4×	96 1.1×	179 2.5×	56 0.8×	12	637
Christine Atwell United Kingdom	10	322 1.4×	120 1.2×	38 0.4×	55 0.8×	19 0.3×	13	488
Jari Ahvenainen Finland	7	184 0.8×	72 0.7×	37 0.4×	43 0.6×	89 1.3×	8	589
Pilar Brugulat Spain	12	184 0.8×	87 0.9×	30 0.3×	104 1.4×	37 0.6×	22	499
Milena Anatchkova United States	16	176 0.8×	133 1.3×	48 0.5×	88 1.2×	26 0.4×	52	674
Li Feng Tan Singapore	12	244 1.1×	101 1.0×	61 0.7×	59 0.8×	27 0.4×	56	690

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Sansoni

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Sansoni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Sansoni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Sansoni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Sansoni

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Sansoni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Sansoni. The network helps show where Janet Sansoni may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Sansoni

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Sansoni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Sansoni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Sansoni. Janet Sansoni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2023). Clinical features, treatments, their impact, and quality of life for Myasthenia Gravis patients in Australia. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 118. 16–22. 1 indexed citations

Ruseckaite, Rasa, Ashika Maharaj, Karolina Krysińska, et al.. (2022). Preliminary development of recommendations for the inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical quality registries. BMC Health Services Research. 22(1). 276–276. 17 indexed citations

Williams, Kathryn, Janet Sansoni, Darcy Morris, & Cristina Thompson. (2017). A Delphi study to develop indicators of cancer patient experience for quality improvement. Supportive Care in Cancer. 26(1). 129–138. 17 indexed citations

Sansoni, Janet, Darcy Morris, Cristina Thompson, & Kate Williams. (2016). Development of prioritised patient experience indicators for the Patient Centred Quality Cancer System Program: Synthesis Report. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1 indexed citations

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2016). Younger Onset Dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias®. 31(8). 693–705. 54 indexed citations

Morris, Darcy, et al.. (2016). Patient reported outcome measures: An environmental scan of the Australian health care sector. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 25 indexed citations

Sansoni, Janet. (2016). Health Outcomes: An Overview from an Australian Perspective (2016). Research Online (University of Wollongong). 9 indexed citations

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2015). The Revised Urinary Incontinence Scale: a clinical validation. 21(2). 43–52. 3 indexed citations

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2015). Question Prompt Lists in health consultations: A review. Patient Education and Counseling. 98(12). 1454–1464. 117 indexed citations

10.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2014). Younger onset dementia: an overview of service and research issues. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 92. 1 indexed citations

11.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2013). The Revised Faecal Incontinence Scale. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 56(5). 652–659. 33 indexed citations

12.

Fildes, David L, et al.. (2013). Final report: literature review and needs and feasibility assessment of services for people with younger onset dementia. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 7 indexed citations

13.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2012). An Assessment Framework for Aged Care. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 2 indexed citations

14.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2011). Validation and clinical translation of the revised continence and patient satisfaction tools: Final report. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 4 indexed citations

15.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2010). Clinical validation of a short urinary incontinence measure and its correlation with measures of HRQOL. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 25(3). 1028–1034. 1 indexed citations

16.

Hawthorne, Graeme, et al.. (2009). An update on the development of the short assessment of patient satisfaction (SAPS). Research Online (University of Wollongong). 2 indexed citations

17.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2008). Recent findings: the dementia outcomes measurement suite (DOMS) project. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 1 indexed citations

18.

Sansoni, Janet, Yun‐Hee Jeon, Lesley Chenoweth, et al.. (2007). Dementia Outcomes Measurement Suite (DOMS) Project: Final Report. UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney). 9 indexed citations

19.

Sansoni, Janet, et al.. (2002). [The caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease: the profile of hidden sacrifice].. PubMed. 53(4). 208–12. 1 indexed citations

20.

Vellone, Ercole, et al.. (2002). Stress, ansia e depressione delle caregivers di pazienti affetti da Malattia d’Alzheimer. Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University). 14. 223–232. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact