Catherine Urch

40 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Catherine Urch
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 240
  • Physiology 363
  • Oncology 180
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 113
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 89
Replace Elaine Boland with:
Elaine Boland United Kingdom
Magdalena Kocot-Kępska Poland
Vera Peuckmann‐Post Germany
Dominique Lossignol Belgium
Bernhard Frank United Kingdom
Mark J. Stillman United States
Larry Driver United States
Henning Cuhls Germany
T.K. Murphy United States
Karen Robb United Kingdom
Catherine Urch relative to Elaine Boland United Kingdom Elaine Boland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Elaine Boland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Urch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Urch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Urch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Urch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Urch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Urch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Urch. The network helps show where Catherine Urch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Urch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Urch Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Urch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004115
2 2004104
3 201084
4 200368
5 201164
6 200543
7 200540
8 200836
9 201935
10 200430
11 201223
12 201923
13 201622
14 200021
15 200119
16 202317
17 199116
18 202112
19 200711
20 20238

About Catherine Urch

Catherine Urch is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (240 citations), Physiology (363 citations), Oncology (180 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (113 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (89 citations). Catherine Urch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Anthony H. Dickenson, Tansy Donovan-Rodríguez, Edwina A. Brown, Andrew J.T. George, Stephanie Archer, Clair Le Boutillier, Richard Gordon-Williams, Lucy Bee, Louise Mansfield and Wael A. Rahman. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Global Health, Clinical Medicine, Palliative Medicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026