Paul Farquhar-Smith
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 10
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 10
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 6
-
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 6
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 4
-
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment 4
-
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 4
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 3
- Co-authors
- Matthew BrownAndrew S.C. RiceSiân JaggarTimothy WigmorePascale GruberJuan D. RamirezMike PotterJohn E. Williams
- Journals
- Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care (6 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (4 papers)Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Paul Farquhar-Smith
34 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 267
- Pharmacology 190
- Physiology 266
- Oncology 268
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Farquhar-Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Farquhar-Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Farquhar-Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Farquhar-Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Farquhar-Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Farquhar-Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Farquhar-Smith. The network helps show where Paul Farquhar-Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Farquhar-Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 18 | The clinical and cost-effectiveness of different treatment pathways for neuropathic pain (NP) | 2010 | 1 |
| 19 | 2010 | 102 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 9 |
About Paul Farquhar-Smith
Paul Farquhar-Smith is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Oncology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (10 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (267 citations), Pharmacology (190 citations) and Physiology (266 citations). Paul Farquhar-Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Brown, Andrew S.C. Rice, Siân Jaggar, Timothy Wigmore, Pascale Gruber, Timothy Wigmore, Juan D. Ramirez, Mike Potter, John E. Williams and David J. Magee. Their work appears in journals such as Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, Pain and Journal of the Intensive Care Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.