Cathérine Cassiman
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Molecular Biology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Ingele CasteelsEric LegiusKarel AllegaertJoachim Van CalsterWerner SpileersVeerle CosseyMarc Van RanstJulie A. Jacob
- Topics
- Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers)Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (5 papers)Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers)
- Cited by
- OphthalmologyNeurologyEpidemiology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTransplantationBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Cathérine Cassiman
23 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Ophthalmology 127
- Neurology 101
- Epidemiology 100
- Molecular Biology 49
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 43
Countries citing papers authored by Cathérine Cassiman
This map shows the geographic impact of Cathérine Cassiman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cathérine Cassiman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cathérine Cassiman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cathérine Cassiman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cathérine Cassiman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cathérine Cassiman. The network helps show where Cathérine Cassiman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cathérine Cassiman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cathérine Cassiman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cathérine Cassiman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cathérine Cassiman. Cathérine Cassiman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Cathérine Cassiman
Cathérine Cassiman is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Transplantation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (5 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (127 citations), Neurology (101 citations) and Epidemiology (100 citations). Cathérine Cassiman has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ingele Casteels, Eric Legius, Karel Allegaert, Joachim Van Calster, Werner Spileers, Veerle Cossey, Marc Van Ranst, Julie A. Jacob, Richard G. Vile and José S. Pulido. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Transplantation and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.