Catharine Gray

522 total citations
5 papers, 33 citations indexed

About

Catharine Gray is a scholar working on History, Literature and Literary Theory and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Catharine Gray has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 33 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in History, 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Catharine Gray's work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers). Catharine Gray is often cited by papers focused on Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers). Catharine Gray collaborates with scholars based in United States. Catharine Gray's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as ELH, English Literary Renaissance and Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Catharine Gray

5 papers receiving 17 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Catharine Gray United States	4	26	19	10	7	4	5	33
Suzanne Trill Netherlands	3	36 1.4×	32 1.7×	10 1.0×	6 0.9×	4 1.0×	13	54
Tom Keymer United Kingdom	4	18 0.7×	42 2.2×	12 1.2×	10 1.4×	4 1.0×	16	55
Edward Copeland United States	4	15 0.6×	32 1.7×	9 0.9×	10 1.4×	6 1.5×	10	53
Jane A. Sharp United States	3	24 0.9×	10 0.5×	12 1.2×	9 1.3×	8 2.0×	5	43
Frances Fanny Burney	3	15 0.6×	19 1.0×	6 0.6×	6 0.9×	3 0.8×	11	36
Dan Breen United States	3	27 1.0×	10 0.5×	18 1.8×	8 1.1×	11 2.8×	12	44
Sarah Prescott United Kingdom	4	47 1.8×	35 1.8×	13 1.3×	18 2.6×	9 2.3×	20	72
John Gough Nichols	4	32 1.2×	21 1.1×	8 0.8×	10 1.4×	7 1.8×	13	59
Greg Kucich United States	5	19 0.7×	23 1.2×	16 1.6×	3 0.4×	5 1.3×	14	48
Pat Rogers United Kingdom	5	9 0.3×	19 1.0×	8 0.8×	3 0.4×	3 0.8×	9	43

Countries citing papers authored by Catharine Gray

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catharine Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catharine Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catharine Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catharine Gray

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catharine Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catharine Gray. The network helps show where Catharine Gray may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Gray, Catharine. (2017). Early Modern Women's Writing: Domesticity, Privacy, and the Public Sphere in England and the Dutch Republic. 1 indexed citations

2.

Gray, Catharine. (2009). Katherine Philips in Ireland. English Literary Renaissance. 39(3). 557–585. 8 indexed citations

3.

Gray, Catharine. (2007). Women Writers and Public Debate in 17th-Century Britain. Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks. 13 indexed citations

4.

Gray, Catharine. (2002). Katherine Philips and the Post‐Courtly Coterie. English Literary Renaissance. 32(3). 426–451. 8 indexed citations

5.

Gray, Catharine. (2001). Feeding on the Seed of the Woman: Dorothy Leigh and the Figure of Maternal Dissent. ELH. 68(3). 563–592. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact