Cath Everett

52 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers

Cath Everett
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Algebra and Number Theory 55
  • Radiation 97
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 29
  • Theoretical Computer Science 8
  • Geometry and Topology 55
Replace Saburou Saitoh with:
Saburou Saitoh Japan
Takayuki Tamura United States
Seymour Haber United States
Madan Lal Mehta France
J.L. Hock United States
Silvio Levy Brazil
A. I. Markushevich United States
M. J. Taylor United Kingdom
Gudrun Heinrich Germany
R. G. Buschman United States
Cath Everett relative to Saburou Saitoh Japan Saburou Saitoh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Saburou Saitoh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cath Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cath Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cath Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cath Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cath Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cath Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cath Everett. The network helps show where Cath Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Cath Everett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cath Everett Line = papers co-authored together Cath Everett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A practical manual on the Monte Carlo method for random walk problems
1959167
2 1960122
3 195973
4 201654
5 196334
6 197723
7 197820
8 197518
9 197116
10 195116
11 196614
12 201112
13 20157
14 19776
15 19706
16 19716
17 19706
18 19676
19 20116
20 20156

About Cath Everett

Cath Everett is a scholar working on Information Systems, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include graph theory and CDMA systems (5 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), Information and Cyber Security (4 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (55 citations), Radiation (97 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (29 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (8 citations) and Geometry and Topology (55 citations). Cath Everett has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E.D. Cashwell, P. R. Stein, Roger C. Lyndon, Stanislaw M. Ulam, Raymond W. Walker, R. R. Baldwin, Richard R. Baker and N. Metropolis. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Advances in Applied Mathematics, Advances in Mathematics and Computer Fraud & Security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact