Carsten Stahn

3.6k citations
78 papers · 742 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Carsten Stahn

67 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Carsten Stahn
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 628
  • History 128
  • Development 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 354
  • Law 62
Replace Anne Orford with:
Anne Orford Australia
Leigh A. Payne United Kingdom
Terry Nardin Singapore
Sofia Näsström Sweden
Ruti Teitel United States
Theodor Meron United States
Diane Orentlicher United States
Timothy Dunne United Kingdom
Oscar Schachter United States
Colin Warbrick United Kingdom
Carsten Stahn relative to Anne Orford Australia Anne Orford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Anne Orford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carsten Stahn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carsten Stahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carsten Stahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carsten Stahn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carsten Stahn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carsten Stahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carsten Stahn. The network helps show where Carsten Stahn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Carsten Stahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carsten Stahn Line = papers co-authored together Carsten Stahn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007104
2 200939
3 200636
4 200833
5 201830
6 200127
7
Jus post bellum: Towards a law of transition from conflict to peace
200823
8 200823
9 200722
10 201122
11 200520
12 200119
13 201419
14 200518
15 200316
16 200515
17 200214
18 202014
19 201214
20 201212

About Carsten Stahn

Carsten Stahn is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy and Law, having authored 78 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (55 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (40 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (9 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (9 papers), European and International Law Studies (9 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (8 papers), International Law and Aviation (7 papers) and Human Rights and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (628 citations), History (128 citations), Development (35 citations), Sociology and Political Science (354 citations) and Law (62 citations). Carsten Stahn has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Hungary and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Göran Sluiter, Jann K. Kleffner, Héctor Olásolo, Mohamed M. El Zeidy, Larissa van den Herik, William A. Schabas, Andreas Zimmermann, Michael A. Newton, Christoph Burchard and Mark A. Drumbl. Their work appears in journals such as Leiden Journal of International Law, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Criminal Law Forum, American Journal of International Law and Nordic Journal of International Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact