Carson Strong

923 citations
43 papers · 458 indexed · h-index 12

Carson Strong

41 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Carson Strong
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 178
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 213
  • General Health Professions 180
  • Reproductive Medicine 55
  • Pharmacy 23
Replace C Strong with:
C Strong United States
John Keown United States
Daniela Leone Italy
Hubert Doucet Canada
Kirsten A. Riggan United States
Janet Malek United States
Jemma Gilchrist Australia
H. Mabel Preloran United States
Sara Fovargue United Kingdom
Anette Hauskov Graungaard Denmark
Carson Strong relative to C Strong United States C Strong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
C Strong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carson Strong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carson Strong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carson Strong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carson Strong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carson Strong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carson Strong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carson Strong. The network helps show where Carson Strong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Carson Strong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carson Strong Line = papers co-authored together Carson Strong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
How should risks and benefits be balanced in research involving pregnant women and fetuses?
201266
2 20110
3 201010
4 20091
5 20085
6 20066
7 20063
8 20063
9 20057
10 200321
11 20037
12
Consent to sperm retrieval and insemination after death or persistent vegetative state.
20011
13 200110
14 20013
15 200033
16 199912
17 199912
18 199814
19 19931
20 19922

About Carson Strong

Carson Strong is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (21 papers), Ethics in medical practice (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (178 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (213 citations), General Health Professions (180 citations), Reproductive Medicine (55 citations) and Pharmacy (23 citations). Carson Strong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Thomas E. Elkins, Jeffrey P. Phelan, Susan R. Johnson, Alan R. Wolfe, Douglas Brown, David Muram, Paul N. Black, Stephanie Scott and Shannon Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Metamedicine, The Hastings Center Report, The Journal of Clinical Ethics, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics and The American Journal of Bioethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026