Caroline L. Smith

25 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Caroline L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 327
  • Linguistics and Language 200
  • Artificial Intelligence 157
  • Language and Linguistics 125
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 55
Replace Michael O’Dell with:
Michael O’Dell Finland
Renée van Bezooijen Netherlands
Olle Engstrand Sweden
Kenneth J. de Jong United States
Klaus J. Köhler Germany
Marzena Żygis Germany
Sharon Y. Manuel United States
K.J. Kohler Germany
Ian Wilson Japan
Eva Strangert Sweden
Caroline L. Smith relative to Michael O’Dell Finland Michael O’Dell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael O’Dell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline L. Smith. The network helps show where Caroline L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline L. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline L. Smith. Caroline L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 11
3 45
4 5
5 5
6
Bypassing Words in Automatic Speech Recognition.
1
7
Emphasis does not always coincide with phrasal boundaries in spontaneous spoken French
1
8
Perception of Prominence and Boundaries by Naïve French Listeners.
4
9 1
10 1
11 25
12 3
13
MARKING THE BOUNDARY: UTTERANCE-FINAL PROSODY IN FRENCH QUESTIONS AND STATEMENTS
6
14
Fricative devoicing: effects of prosodic context on a lenition process
1
15 111
16 21
17
Illustration of the IPA: French
4
18 28
19 2
20 2

About Caroline L. Smith

Caroline L. Smith is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (21 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (11 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (200 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (327 citations) and Language and Linguistics (125 citations). Caroline L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Cécile Fougeron, Jennifer Cole, José Ignacio Hualde, Catherine P. Browman, Bruce A. Kay, Richard S. McGowan, Donna Erickson, Christophe Savariaux, Elliot Saltzman and Brenda Nicodemus. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Pediatric Research and Journal of Phonetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026