This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Strangert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Strangert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Strangert more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Strangert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Strangert. The network helps show where Eva Strangert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Strangert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Strangert.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Strangert based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Strangert. Eva Strangert is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strangert, Eva & Thierry Deschamps. (2009). The Prosody of Public Speech - A Description of a Project. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 52. 121–124.2 indexed citations
2.
Strangert, Eva & Joakim Gustafson. (2008). Subject ratings, acoustic measurements and synthesis of good-speaker characteristics. Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 1688–1691.4 indexed citations
Biadsy, Fadi, Andrew Rosenberg, Rolf Carlson, Julia Hirschberg, & Eva Strangert. (2008). A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American, Palestinian, and Swedish.1 indexed citations
6.
Strangert, Eva. (2007). Databaser och digitalisering inom humaniora : existerande resurser och framtida behov.1 indexed citations
Strangert, Eva, et al.. (2005). Word accents over time : comparing present-day data with Meyer's accent contours. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 79–82.1 indexed citations
Carlson, Rolf, Björn Granström, Mattias Heldner, et al.. (2002). Boundaries and groupings: the structuring of speech in different communicative situations. A description of the GROG project. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 65–69.22 indexed citations
Bruce, Gösta, et al.. (2000). Collecting dialect data and making use of them an interim report from Swedia 2000. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 17–20.4 indexed citations
15.
Heldner, Mattias, Eva Strangert, & Thierry Deschamps. (1999). Focus Detection Using Overall Intensity and High Frequency Emphasis.3 indexed citations
16.
Heldner, Mattias, Eva Strangert, & Thierry Deschamps. (1999). A focus detector using overall intensity and high frequency emphasis. 1491–1493.21 indexed citations
Swerts, Marc, Eva Strangert, & Mattias Heldner. (1996). F0 declination in read-aloud and spontaneous speech. 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1996). 1501–1504.10 indexed citations
19.
Strangert, Eva & Mattias Heldner. (1995). The labelling of prominence in Swedish by phonetically experienced transcribers. 204–207.5 indexed citations
20.
Strangert, Eva, et al.. (1993). Prosody in the perception of syntactic boundaries.. Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.