Caroline Griffith
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Neonatal Health and Biochemistry 1
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 1
- Co-authors
- Vivian P. Ta (2 shared papers)Richard Body (2 shared papers)Garry McDowell (2 shared papers)Brian Keevil (2 shared papers)Kevin Mackway‐Jones (1 shared paper)Simon Carley (1 shared paper)Stuart J. Moat (2 shared papers)Finlay MacKenzie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Neonatal Screening (1 paper)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (1 paper)Bioanalysis (1 paper)Clinica Chimica Acta (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Caroline Griffith
6 papers receiving 306 citations
Caroline Griffith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Applied Psychology 105
- Health Informatics 11
- Social Psychology 88
- Human-Computer Interaction 19
- Artificial Intelligence 104
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Griffith
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Griffith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Griffith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Griffith. The network helps show where Caroline Griffith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 250 |
| 2 | 2009 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 3 |
About Caroline Griffith
Caroline Griffith is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Clinical Biochemistry and Rheumatology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Media Influence and Health (1 paper), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (1 paper), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper) and Digital Communication and Language (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (105 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations), Social Psychology (88 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (19 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (104 citations). Caroline Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vivian P. Ta, Richard Body, Garry McDowell, Brian Keevil, Kevin Mackway‐Jones, Simon Carley, Stuart J. Moat, Finlay MacKenzie, S. K. Hall and Lesley Tetlow. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Neonatal Screening, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, Bioanalysis and Clinica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.