Carl D. Williams

751 total citations
25 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Carl D. Williams is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Carl D. Williams has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Carl D. Williams's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). Carl D. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). Carl D. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Carl D. Williams's co-authors include Randy S. Burke, Robert S. Stephens, Roger A. Roffman, Richard M. Carr, James Houran, Joseph F. Picciano, James F. Sallis, Karen J. Calfas, Harry Krop and Christi A. Patten and has published in prestigious journals such as Addiction, The American Journal of Psychology and Addictive Behaviors.

In The Last Decade

Carl D. Williams

24 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Carl D. Williams United States	13	158	120	114	97	97	25	549
James Rosso United States	7	331 2.1×	52 0.4×	49 0.4×	108 1.1×	111 1.1×	10	799
Stephanie Hart United States	12	184 1.2×	68 0.6×	200 1.8×	57 0.6×	294 3.0×	26	632
Natalie Williams United States	10	228 1.4×	207 1.7×	114 1.0×	34 0.4×	89 0.9×	20	766
Christie A. Hartman United States	14	294 1.9×	167 1.4×	75 0.7×	44 0.5×	178 1.8×	17	759
David C. Rimm United States	15	500 3.2×	55 0.5×	225 2.0×	228 2.4×	177 1.8×	38	941
C. Richard Spates United States	14	626 4.0×	54 0.5×	76 0.7×	136 1.4×	102 1.1×	30	850
C.B. Scrignar United States	6	430 2.7×	28 0.2×	68 0.6×	121 1.2×	88 0.9×	16	663
Robin Corley United States	10	403 2.6×	39 0.3×	108 0.9×	117 1.2×	75 0.8×	15	673
Henry Amado United States	7	356 2.3×	48 0.4×	43 0.4×	50 0.5×	98 1.0×	8	571
Elizabeth K. Reynolds United States	11	343 2.2×	138 1.1×	18 0.2×	119 1.2×	87 0.9×	11	684

Countries citing papers authored by Carl D. Williams

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl D. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl D. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl D. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl D. Williams

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl D. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl D. Williams. The network helps show where Carl D. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carl D. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carl D. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carl D. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carl D. Williams. Carl D. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Holland, Jason M., et al.. (2015). Treatment Preferences of Older Adults with Substance Use Problems. Clinical Gerontologist. 39(1). 15–24. 12 indexed citations

Ando, Hikari, Carl D. Williams, Robert Angus, et al.. (2014). Why don't they accept non‐invasive ventilation?: Insight into the interpersonal perspectives of patients with motor neurone disease. British Journal of Health Psychology. 20(2). 341–359. 26 indexed citations

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (2010). Communicating the Intangible: A Phenomenological Exploration of Energy Healing. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 7(1). 45–56. 1 indexed citations

Stephens, Robert S., et al.. (2007). The Marijuana Check‐up: promoting change in ambivalent marijuana users. Addiction. 102(6). 947–957. 79 indexed citations

Stephens, Robert S., et al.. (2004). The Marijuana Check‐up: reaching users who are ambivalent about change. Addiction. 99(10). 1323–1332. 65 indexed citations

Patten, Christi A., Kristin S. Vickers, John E. Martin, & Carl D. Williams. (2003). Exercise interventions for smokers with a history of alcoholism. Addictive Behaviors. 28(4). 657–667. 14 indexed citations

Fox, Jezz & Carl D. Williams. (2000). Paranormal Belief, Experience, and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter. Psychological Reports. 86(3_suppl). 1104–1106. 2 indexed citations

Patten, Christi A., John E. Martin, C. Richard Hofstetter, et al.. (1999). Smoking Cessation Following Treatment in a Smoke-Free Navy Alcohol Rehabilitation Program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 16(1). 61–69. 13 indexed citations

Williams, Carl D., James F. Sallis, Karen J. Calfas, & Randy S. Burke. (1999). Psychosocial and Demographic Correlates of Television Viewing. American Journal of Health Promotion. 13(4). 207–214. 28 indexed citations

10.

Houran, James & Carl D. Williams. (1998). Relation of Tolerance of Ambiguity to Global and Specific Paranormal Experience. Psychological Reports. 83(3). 807–818. 30 indexed citations

11.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1982). Humphreys' “Acquisition and Extinction of Verbal Expectations” Revisited: Evidence for a Partial Reinforcement Hump Effect. Psychological Reports. 51(3_suppl). 1023–1034.

12.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1970). A Three-Element Model for Binary Prediction. Psychological Reports. 26(1). 327–335. 2 indexed citations

13.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1969). Extinction of human eyelid conditioning as a function of components of a masking procedure. Psychonomic Science. 17(6). 337–338. 1 indexed citations

14.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1969). Motivational Correlates of Strategy Choices in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game. The Journal of Social Psychology. 79(2). 211–217. 8 indexed citations

15.

Krop, Harry, et al.. (1969). Effect of Induced Stress on Convergent and Divergent Thinking. Psychological Reports. 24(3). 895–898. 21 indexed citations

16.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1966). Maze Exploration in Young Rats of Four Ages. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 109(2). 241–247. 12 indexed citations

17.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1962). Exploratory behavior of the crosses of three strains of rats.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 55(1). 121–122. 8 indexed citations

18.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1960). Manifest Needs and Manifest Anxiety.. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 24(4). 371–371. 2 indexed citations

19.

Williams, Carl D., et al.. (1957). Exploratory behavior in two mazes with dissimilar alternatives.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 50(5). 509–513. 27 indexed citations

20.

Carr, Richard M. & Carl D. Williams. (1957). Exploratory behavior of three strains of rats.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 50(6). 621–623. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact