Callixte Karege
About
In The Last Decade
Callixte Karege
7 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Animal Science and Zoology 168
- Small Animals 93
- Agronomy and Crop Science 62
- Genetics 60
- Food Science 38
Countries citing papers authored by Callixte Karege
This map shows the geographic impact of Callixte Karege's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Callixte Karege with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Callixte Karege more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Callixte Karege
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Callixte Karege. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Callixte Karege. The network helps show where Callixte Karege may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Callixte Karege
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Callixte Karege. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Callixte Karege based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Callixte Karege. Callixte Karege is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 178 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.