Cæsar E. Farah
Impact in
-
- Islamic Studies and History
- African history and culture analysis
-
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Middle East Politics and Society
- Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Papers in
-
- Islamic Studies and History 18
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Doreen WarrinerOtto SpiesA. L. TibawiAnnemarie SchımmelGabriel BaerHamid EnayatG. H. A. JuynbollRobert W. Olson
- Journals
- Die Welt des Islams (10 papers)The American Historical Review (5 papers)Digest of Middle East Studies (4 papers)International Journal Middle East Studies (1 paper)Der Islam (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Cæsar E. Farah
24 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Political Science and International Relations 109
- Sociology and Political Science 110
- Space and Planetary Science 3
- Archeology 22
- Anthropology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Cæsar E. Farah
This map shows the geographic impact of Cæsar E. Farah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cæsar E. Farah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cæsar E. Farah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cæsar E. Farah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cæsar E. Farah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cæsar E. Farah. The network helps show where Cæsar E. Farah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Cæsar E. Farah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 4 | The politics of interventionism in Ottoman Lebanon, 1830-1861 | 2000 | 26 |
| 5 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 3 | |
| 13 | The dhayl in medieval Arabic historiography | 1967 | 2 |
| 14 | 1965 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1963 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1963 | 27 |
About Cæsar E. Farah
Cæsar E. Farah is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Accounting, having authored 33 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (18 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (8 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (6 papers), Middle East Politics and Society (5 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (4 papers) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (109 citations), Sociology and Political Science (110 citations), Space and Planetary Science (3 citations), Archeology (22 citations) and Anthropology (17 citations). Cæsar E. Farah has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Doreen Warriner, Otto Spies, A. L. Tibawi, Annemarie Schımmel, Gabriel Baer, Hamid Enayat, G. H. A. Juynboll, Robert W. Olson, Bernard Lewıs and Peter Bachmann. Their work appears in journals such as Die Welt des Islams, The American Historical Review, Digest of Middle East Studies, International Journal Middle East Studies and Der Islam.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.