C. Tropé

1.3k citations
44 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 19

C. Tropé

43 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

C. Tropé
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Reproductive Medicine 425
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 380
  • Cancer Research 219
  • Oncology 215
  • Surgery 263
Replace N. Einhorn with:
N. Einhorn Sweden
W Gajewski United States
S. Pecorelli Italy
Cecelia H. Boardman United States
Soon‐Beom Kang South Korea
J. F. Pringle Canada
Chad A. Hamilton United States
Annika Auranen Finland
Antonio Santillan United States
Eirini Pectasides Greece
C. Tropé relative to N. Einhorn Sweden N. Einhorn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
N. Einhorn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Tropé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Tropé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Tropé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Tropé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Tropé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Tropé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Tropé. The network helps show where C. Tropé may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Tropé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Tropé Line = papers co-authored together C. Tropé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200418
2
High-resolution Image Analysis - A Better Method for Predicting Prognosis in Early Ovarian Cancer
20002
3 200088
4 2000163
5 200046
6 199913
7 199721
8 199744
9 199732
10
Randomized trial on adjuvant carboplatin versus no treatment in stage I high risk ovarian cancer by th Nordic Ovarian Cancer Study Group (NOCOVA)
19978
11
Adjuvant Therapy for Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
19971
12 199627
13 19940
14 199250
15 199215
16 199216
17 199019
18 19898
19 19888
20 19885

About C. Tropé

C. Tropé is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (23 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (13 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (425 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (380 citations), Cancer Research (219 citations), Oncology (215 citations) and Surgery (263 citations). C. Tropé has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Kolbein Sundfør, Heidi Lyng, J. Kærn, E K Rofstad, Christian Marth, Einar K. Rofstad, Vera M. Abeler, Marit Scheistrøen, Ignace Vergote and Mathias Onsrud. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Annals of Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026