Irem Sepil

1.8k total citations
36 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Irem Sepil is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Irem Sepil has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 14 papers in Genetics and 11 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Irem Sepil's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (21 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers) and Plant and animal studies (8 papers). Irem Sepil is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (21 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers) and Plant and animal studies (8 papers). Irem Sepil collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Irem Sepil's co-authors include Ben C. Sheldon, Stuart Wigby, Shelly Lachish, Ben R. Hopkins, Élise Huchard, Amy E. Hinks, Hooman K. Moghadam, Sassan Saatchi, Wolfgang Buermann and Thomas B. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Irem Sepil

34 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Irem Sepil United Kingdom 20 536 432 325 300 148 36 1.1k
Jennifer L. Grindstaff United States 17 681 1.3× 153 0.4× 465 1.4× 236 0.8× 150 1.0× 39 1.2k
Maria Strandh Sweden 18 350 0.7× 307 0.7× 275 0.8× 141 0.5× 160 1.1× 30 1.1k
Corinne L. Richards‐Zawacki United States 27 812 1.5× 239 0.6× 399 1.2× 81 0.3× 139 0.9× 84 2.1k
Pavel Munclinger Czechia 25 731 1.4× 909 2.1× 637 2.0× 214 0.7× 59 0.4× 64 1.8k
Guillermo González Chile 15 924 1.7× 137 0.3× 693 2.1× 506 1.7× 106 0.7× 55 1.5k
Matthew D. Venesky United States 19 533 1.0× 242 0.6× 501 1.5× 86 0.3× 141 1.0× 39 1.6k
David Duneau France 20 241 0.4× 464 1.1× 319 1.0× 136 0.5× 236 1.6× 34 1.2k
Heli Siitari Finland 26 1.2k 2.3× 283 0.7× 1.0k 3.2× 275 0.9× 71 0.5× 53 1.9k
Victor Apanius United States 18 665 1.2× 219 0.5× 568 1.7× 303 1.0× 267 1.8× 25 1.3k
Matthew C. Tinsley United Kingdom 22 515 1.0× 416 1.0× 214 0.7× 100 0.3× 128 0.9× 39 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Irem Sepil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Irem Sepil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irem Sepil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irem Sepil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Irem Sepil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irem Sepil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irem Sepil. The network helps show where Irem Sepil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irem Sepil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irem Sepil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irem Sepil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Irem Sepil. Irem Sepil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Henshaw, Jonathan M., et al.. (2025). Diagnosing confounded Bateman gradients. Evolution. 79(9). 1937–1953.
2.
Pizzari, Tommaso, et al.. (2024). What does not kill you makes you stronger? Effects of paternal age at conception on fathers and sons. Evolution. 78(9). 1619–1632. 2 indexed citations
3.
Vega‐Trejo, Regina, et al.. (2024). Fear of mating out (FOMO): voyeurism does not increase mating propensity in fruit flies. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 31916–31916.
4.
Sepil, Irem, et al.. (2024). Genetic, natal and spatial drivers of social phenotypes in wild great tits. Journal of Animal Ecology. 94(2). 220–232. 1 indexed citations
5.
Vega‐Trejo, Regina, Shinichi Nakagawa, Samuel J. L. Gascoigne, et al.. (2024). Meta-analysis shows no consistent evidence for senescence in ejaculate traits across animals. Nature Communications. 15(1). 558–558. 8 indexed citations
6.
Sepil, Irem, et al.. (2022). Experimental evolution under varying sex ratio and nutrient availability modulates male mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Biology Letters. 18(6). 20210652–20210652. 3 indexed citations
7.
Archer, C. Ruth, Maria Paniw, Regina Vega‐Trejo, & Irem Sepil. (2022). A sex skew in life-history research: the problem of missing males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 289(1979). 20221117–20221117. 13 indexed citations
8.
Gascoigne, Samuel J. L., et al.. (2022). Plasticity’s role in adaptive evolution depends on environmental change components. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 37(12). 1067–1078. 54 indexed citations
9.
Wigby, Stuart, et al.. (2021). Male condition influences female post mating aggression and feeding in Drosophila. Functional Ecology. 35(6). 1288–1298. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hopkins, Ben R., Irem Sepil, & Stuart Wigby. (2020). Structural variation in Drosophila melanogaster spermathecal ducts and its association with sperm competition dynamics. Royal Society Open Science. 7(3). 200130–200130. 4 indexed citations
11.
Wigby, Stuart, Nora C. Brown, Sarah E. Allen, et al.. (2020). TheDrosophilaseminal proteome and its role in postcopulatory sexual selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 375(1813). 20200072–20200072. 77 indexed citations
12.
Hopkins, Ben R., Irem Sepil, Sarah Bonham, et al.. (2019). BMP signaling inhibition in Drosophila secondary cells remodels the seminal proteome and self and rival ejaculate functions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(49). 24719–24728. 28 indexed citations
13.
Sepil, Irem, Ben R. Hopkins, Rebecca Dean, et al.. (2018). Quantitative Proteomics Identification of Seminal Fluid Proteins in Male Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 18(Suppl 1). S46–S58. 58 indexed citations
14.
Hopkins, Ben R., Irem Sepil, & Stuart Wigby. (2017). Seminal fluid. Current Biology. 27(11). R404–R405. 43 indexed citations
15.
Bonneaud, Camille, Irem Sepil, Lena Wilfert, & Ryan Calsbeek. (2017). Plasmodium Infections in Natural Populations of Anolis sagrei Reflect Tolerance Rather Than Susceptibility. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 57(2). 352–361. 13 indexed citations
16.
Sepil, Irem, et al.. (2017). Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in Drosophila. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 284(1860). 20170441–20170441. 24 indexed citations
17.
Sepil, Irem, Pau Carazo, Jennifer C. Perry, & Stuart Wigby. (2016). Insulin signalling mediates the response to male-induced harm in female Drosophila melanogaster. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 30205–30205. 8 indexed citations
18.
Eimes, John A., Andrea K. Townsend, Irem Sepil, Isao Nishiumi, & Yoko Satta. (2015). Patterns of evolution of MHC class II genes of crows ( Corvus ) suggest trans-species polymorphism. PeerJ. 3. e853–e853. 22 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Thomas B., Borja Milá, Gregory F. Grether, et al.. (2007). Evolutionary consequences of human disturbance in a rainforest bird species from Central Africa. Molecular Ecology. 17(1). 58–71. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026