Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet
- Journal
- Nature Physics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nphys2231 →Countries where authors are citing Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet
This map shows the geographic impact of Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet
This network shows the impact of Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet.
About Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet
This paper, published in 2012, received 743 indexed citations . Written by T. Schulz, Robert A. Ritz, A. Bauer, M. Halder, Martin Wagner, Christian Franz, C. Pfleiderer, Karin Everschor‐Sitte, Markus Garst and Achim Rosch covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (684 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (458 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (326 citations). Published in Nature Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nphys2231.