C. Mitchell Conover

1.2k citations
37 papers · 726 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

C. Mitchell Conover

34 papers receiving 644 citations

Peers

C. Mitchell Conover
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Finance 457
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 238
  • Accounting 275
  • Economics and Econometrics 441
  • Strategy and Management 122
Replace Dennis Bams with:
Dennis Bams Netherlands
Jan Annaert Belgium
Saadet Kasman Türkiye
Mbodja Mougoué United States
Sheng‐Yung Yang Taiwan
Paolo Colla Italy
Günter Franke Germany
Wenjin Kang China
Avraham Kamara United States
Nikiforos T. Laopodis United States
C. Mitchell Conover relative to Dennis Bams Netherlands Dennis Bams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Dennis Bams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Mitchell Conover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Mitchell Conover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Mitchell Conover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Mitchell Conover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Mitchell Conover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Mitchell Conover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Mitchell Conover. The network helps show where C. Mitchell Conover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside C. Mitchell Conover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Mitchell Conover Line = papers co-authored together C. Mitchell Conover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999112
2 200998
3 199892
4 201059
5 200748
6 200540
7 200233
8 200831
9 199928
10 199924
11 200422
12 200221
13 200620
14 200711
15 200711
16 200210
17 20069
18 20019
19 20068
20 20046

About C. Mitchell Conover

C. Mitchell Conover is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 37 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (20 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (11 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (10 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (4 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (457 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (238 citations), Accounting (275 citations), Economics and Econometrics (441 citations) and Strategy and Management (122 citations). C. Mitchell Conover has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gerald R. Jensen, Robert R. Johnson, Robert Miller, Jeffrey M. Mercer, W. Scott Bauman, Andrew C. Szakmary, Carol Lancaster, Don R. Cox, G. Stacy Sirmans and Marc W. Simpson. Their work appears in journals such as Financial Analysts Journal, Journal of Banking & Finance, The Journal of Portfolio Management, The Journal of Financial Research and The Journal of Business.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact