Financial Analysts Journal

2.9k papers and 77.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Financial Analysts Journal in the last decades have received a total of 77.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Financial Analysts Journal usually cover Finance (1.3k papers), Accounting (842 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (801 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1.0k papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (388 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (346 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Financial Analysts Journal are Fischer Black, Meir Statman, Eugene F. Fama, Campbell R. Harvey, William F. Sharpe, Bruno Solnik, Andrew W. Lo, Richard O. Michaud, Claude B. Erb and Messod D. Beneish.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Financial Analysts Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Financial Analysts Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Financial Analysts Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Financial Analysts Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Financial Analysts Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Financial Analysts Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Financial Analysts Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025