C. M. Naumann

1.3k citations
55 papers · 902 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

C. M. Naumann

51 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

C. M. Naumann
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Insect Science 395
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 422
  • Genetics 334
  • Ecological Modeling 51
  • Plant Science 364
Replace D. A. Downie with:
D. A. Downie United States
Dale Habeck United States
C. F. Hinks Canada
Kirsten D Scott Australia
Eduardo Fuentes‐Contreras Chile
J. E. McFarlane Canada
Lisa E. Wallace United States
Gabriela Gleiser Argentina
Yan‐Qiong Peng China
J. Playford Australia
C. M. Naumann relative to D. A. Downie United States D. A. Downie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
D. A. Downie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. M. Naumann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. M. Naumann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. M. Naumann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. M. Naumann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. M. Naumann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. M. Naumann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. M. Naumann. The network helps show where C. M. Naumann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside C. M. Naumann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. M. Naumann Line = papers co-authored together C. M. Naumann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004247
2 199971
3 199665
4 200656
5 198734
6 200533
7 198530
8
The Western Palaearctic Zygaenidae (Lepidoptera).
199929
9 200326
10 200423
11 200720
12 198419
13 199118
14
Untersuchungen zur Systematik und Phylogenese der Holarktischen Sesiiden (Insecta, Lepidoptera)
197116
15 199816
16 198816
17 198615
18 198414
19 200614
20 198412

About C. M. Naumann

C. M. Naumann is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Plant Science and Ecology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 902 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (24 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (19 papers), Biological Control of Invasive Species (15 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (12 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (7 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (395 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (422 citations), Genetics (334 citations), Ecological Modeling (51 citations) and Plant Science (364 citations). C. M. Naumann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Taiwan and Yemen. Frequent co-authors include Mika Zagrobelny, Søren Bak, Birger Lindberg Møller, Bodil Jørgensen, Bernhard Misof, Oliver Niehuis, Г. М. Тарманн, Shen‐Horn Yen, Adolf Nahrstedt and Werner T. Flueck. Their work appears in journals such as Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, Systematic Entomology, Acta Zoologica, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society and Insect Systematics & Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact