Insect Systematics & Evolution

1.5k papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Insect Systematics & Evolution in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Insect Systematics & Evolution usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k papers), Genetics (601 papers) and Insect Science (498 papers) specifically the topics of Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (420 papers), Plant and animal studies (316 papers) and Evolutionary History of Insects and Amber Fossils (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Insect Systematics & Evolution are Jan Pettersson, Joël Minet, Kelly B. Miller, Göran Nordlander, N. Møller Andersen, Jakob Damgaard, Ole A. Sæther, Christer Hansson, Bradley J. Sinclair and Anders N. Nilsson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Insect Systematics & Evolution

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Insect Systematics & Evolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Insect Systematics & Evolution.

Countries where authors publish in Insect Systematics & Evolution

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Insect Systematics & Evolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Insect Systematics & Evolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insect Systematics & Evolution more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025