C. L. Baker
- Language and Linguistics top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Linguistics and Language top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Karin Aijmer
- Topics
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers)Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers)Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. L. Baker
13 papers receiving 983 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Language and Linguistics 700
- Artificial Intelligence 631
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 343
- Linguistics and Language 241
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 224
Countries citing papers authored by C. L. Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of C. L. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. L. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. L. Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. L. Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. L. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. L. Baker. The network helps show where C. L. Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. L. Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. L. Baker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. L. Baker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. L. Baker. C. L. Baker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62 | |
| 2 | English syntax : second edition | 4 |
| 3 | The syntax of English 'not': the limits of core grammar | 59 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Two observations on British English 'do' | 6 |
| 6 | Formal principles of language acquisition . By Kenneth Wexler and Peter W. Culicover. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980. Pp. xvii, 647. $35.00.breakdown → | 739 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 87 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Indirect questions in English | 46 |
| 13 | Notes on the Description of English Questions: The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme | 167 |
| 14 | Joss : introduction to a helpful assistant | 8 |
About C. L. Baker
C. L. Baker is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers) and Second Language Acquisition and Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (700 citations), Linguistics and Language (241 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (343 citations). C. L. Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karin Aijmer. Their work appears in journals such as Language, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Modern Language Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.