Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Readings in English Transformational Grammar
1973689 citationsDonald T. Forman, Roderick A. Jacobs et al.Modern Language Journalprofile →
The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions
1970418 citationsTerence Moore, Peter S. RosenbaumLanguageprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter S. Rosenbaum
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter S. Rosenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter S. Rosenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter S. Rosenbaum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter S. Rosenbaum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter S. Rosenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter S. Rosenbaum. The network helps show where Peter S. Rosenbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter S. Rosenbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter S. Rosenbaum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter S. Rosenbaum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter S. Rosenbaum. Peter S. Rosenbaum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Bjarkman, Peter C., Roderick A. Jacobs, & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1982). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Modern Language Journal. 66(2). 201–201.129 indexed citations
2.
Rosenbaum, Peter S.. (1973). Peer-mediated instruction. Teachers College Press eBooks.9 indexed citations
3.
Rosenbaum, Peter S.. (1973). The New Research.. Research in the Teaching of English.2 indexed citations
4.
Forman, Donald T., Roderick A. Jacobs, & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1973). Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Modern Language Journal. 57(1/2). 55–55.689 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Jacobs, Roderick A. & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1971). Transformations, style, and meaning. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
6.
Ianni, Francis A. J. & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1970). Technology in the Urban Education Marketplace.. Educational Technology archive.
7.
Moore, Terence & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1970). The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Language. 46(2). 460–460.418 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Newmeyer, Frederick J., Roderick A. Jacobs, & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1970). English Transformational Grammar. Modern Language Journal. 54(7). 530–530.111 indexed citations
9.
Cannon, Garland, Roderick A. Jacobs, & Peter S. Rosenbaum. (1970). English Transformational Grammar. College Composition and Communication. 21(1). 81–81.28 indexed citations
Rosenbaum, Peter S.. (1965). A PRINCIPLE GOVERNING DELETION IN ENGLISH SENTENTIAL COMPLEMENTATION..34 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.