C. Hodes
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- M G EverittC J BulpittPauline RogersArnold BloomKenneth ShawChristopher J. BulpittMaureen O’Brien
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper)Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
C. Hodes
14 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Ophthalmology 156
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 101
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 41
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 41
- Neurology 34
Countries citing papers authored by C. Hodes
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Hodes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Hodes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Hodes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Hodes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Hodes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Hodes. The network helps show where C. Hodes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Hodes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Hodes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Hodes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Hodes. C. Hodes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | High blood pressure: public views and knowledge. | 4 |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | High blood pressure and psychiatric disorder in general practice. | 3 |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 160 | |
| 8 | Seek Wisely to Prevent | 6 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Enuresis--a study in general practice. | 2 |
| 11 | Cervical screening--refusal in general practice. | 3 |
| 12 | Geriatric screening and care in group practice. | 11 |
| 13 | The computer and screening techniques in general practice. | 3 |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | The structure and function of a file of patient health data in general practice. | 9 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | Low dosage Trifluoperazine (Stelazine) in General Practice. | 1 |
About C. Hodes
C. Hodes is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Urology and Dermatology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (156 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (101 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). C. Hodes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include M G Everitt, C J Bulpitt, Pauline Rogers, Arnold Bloom, Kenneth Shaw, Christopher J. Bulpitt and Maureen O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health and British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.