C. E. Peper

3.6k citations
86 papers · 2.8k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

C. E. Peper

86 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

C. E. Peper
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 492
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.8k
  • Rehabilitation 297
  • Social Psychology 635
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 330
Replace Daichi Nozaki with:
Daichi Nozaki Japan
Gerald L. Gottlieb United States
Robert J. van Beers Netherlands
Jean-Jacques Temprado France
Rieko Osu Japan
John J. Buchanan United States
J. P. Scholz United States
J. J. Denier van der Gon Netherlands
Ramesh Balasubramaniam United States
Adrian M. Haith United States
C. E. Peper relative to Daichi Nozaki Japan Daichi Nozaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Daichi Nozaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Peper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Peper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Peper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Peper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Peper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Peper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Peper. The network helps show where C. E. Peper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Peper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. E. Peper Line = papers co-authored together C. E. Peper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995153
2 1995119
3 2012109
4 199597
5 200089
6 200286
7 201184
8 199677
9 201275
10 200571
11 200568
12 199868
13 201264
14 201863
15 200560
16 200660
17 200258
18 199557
19 200551
20 201250

About C. E. Peper

C. E. Peper is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motor Control and Adaptation (46 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (22 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (22 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (18 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (8 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (8 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (492 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.8k citations), Rehabilitation (297 citations), Social Psychology (635 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (330 citations). C. E. Peper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Beek, Andreas Daffertshofer, Melvyn Roerdink, Piet C. W. van Wieringen, Paulina J.M. Bank, Joost C. Dessing, Gert Kwakkel, Dick F. Stegeman, Harjo J. de Poel and Hermann Haken. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Human Movement Science, Biological Cybernetics, Gait & Posture and Journal of Motor Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact