Human Movement Science

2.8k papers and 83.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Human Movement Science in the last decades have received a total of 83.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Movement Science usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k papers), Biomedical Engineering (953 papers) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (707 papers) specifically the topics of Motor Control and Adaptation (1.2k papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (690 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (651 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Movement Science are Jan P. Piek, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, David A. Winter, Gerrit Jan van Ingen Schenau, Roy B. Davis, James R. Gage, Sylvia Ōunpuu, At L. Hof, Gerard P. van Galen and Arthur D. Kuo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Movement Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Movement Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Movement Science.

Countries where authors publish in Human Movement Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Movement Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Movement Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Movement Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025